From: Dan T. <da...@tu...> - 2003-10-03 07:33:24
|
It was based virtually entirely on RH10... I was thinking about making webmin just treat Fedora as RH10, but decided against it in the interests of preparing for the possibility of future changes without impacting the existing RH code and 'doing a proper job' of the port etc... Dan On Fri, 2003-10-03 at 04:41, Jamie Cameron wrote: > Your patch looks cool, but I think it would have made more sense to > have webmin treat Fedora as another Redhat version, or better still the > same as an existing version. Was your port based on one of the existing RH > releases, such as 9 or 10? > > - Jamie > > Dan Tucny <da...@tu...> wrote .. > > Hi, > > > > I've been doing a bit of work porting the 1.113 development release of > > webmin to Fedora Core 0.94, Test 2, Severn... > > > > It all appears to work so I've made a patch... > > > > The patch can be found on the webmin sourceforge site under patches... > > specifically... > > https://sourceforge.net/tracker/index.php?func=detail&aid=816843&group_id=17457&atid=317457 > > > > I hope it's useful... > > > > Thanks, > > > > Dan > > > > > > > > ------------------------------------------------------- > > This sf.net email is sponsored by:ThinkGeek > > Welcome to geek heaven. > > http://thinkgeek.com/sf > > - > > Forwarded by the Webmin development list at web...@we... > > To remove yourself from this list, go to > > http://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/webadmin-devel > > > ------------------------------------------------------- > This sf.net email is sponsored by:ThinkGeek > Welcome to geek heaven. > http://thinkgeek.com/sf > - > Forwarded by the Webmin development list at web...@we... > To remove yourself from this list, go to > http://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/webadmin-devel |