From: Jamie C. <jca...@we...> - 2003-09-11 00:25:37
|
Martin Mewes wrote: > Hi Jamie, >=20 > Jamie Cameron <jca...@we...> wrote: >=20 >=20 >>I agree that this is a potential problem, but fortunately it doesn't >>seem to cause any trouble in reality as all browsers that I've seen can= >>handle single-byte characters like =E4. The only proper solution would = be >>for the default theme to convert all escaped entities into their >>single-byte format before rendering titles. This would be trivial if I >>could find a list of all HTML entities and their corresponding special >>characters .. >=20 >=20 > Well ask your WTCO ;-) scnr :-> >=20 > http://www.henniger-online.de/design/zeichen.htm > ISO-Latin-1- (ISO8859-1) >=20 > http://www.theorem.ca/~mvcorks/code/charsets/auto.html > Unicode Characters as Named and Numeric HTML Entities >=20 > http://www.theorem.ca/~mvcorks/code/charsets/ > Unicode 3.0 character glyphs & numeric entities in HTML 4.0 >=20 > Have a lot of fun ;-) Thanks, they were just what I was looking for. In the 1.110 release,=20 when using the 'old webmin theme' all HTML entities in page titles=20 will be converted to the correct ASCII character for selection of the=20 proper image to display. > I started a discussion on the webmin-trans-list whether to use good > old HTML 3.2 supported Entities or HTML 4 supported ones. >=20 > Reason is, that I want folks not to mix stuff as it may confuse > browsers - What is your opinion? Go for the HTML 3.2 entities - that way you can support the widest=20 range of browsers possible. - Jamie |