Re: 1.030 RPM still unsigned?

[Jamie C. <jca...@we...>]

Wil Cooley <wc...@na...> wrote ..
> 
> Yes, the RPM is still unsigned :(  Jamie, do you need help with the GPG
> part?

No, I've figured out how to work GPG. I'm just looking for a solution for
signing the .tar.gz packages of webmin and individual modules as well
before putting out signed versions. Any idea how people usually handle
the signing of .tar.gz files? With RPMs, the file format can handle the
signature actually being part of the file, but that isn't the case with
tarballs ..

 - Jamie