From: Wil C. <wc...@na...> - 2002-03-27 07:01:00
|
Also Sprach Jamie Cameron <jca...@we...> on Tue, Mar 26, 2002 at 09:= 26:06PM PST >=20 > That's a good solution .. as long as callers are willing to > convert all structures into this format, then I can't see any > problems with it. What someone needs to do is write a gateway > of some kind between webmin-RPC and XML-RPC .. or even add > XML-RPC support directly to webmin. I wouldn't want to get rid > of the existing RPC right away, in order to preserve backwards > compatibility, but there is no reason why they both cannot > exist side-by-side. Well, that's the thing--they don't have to; the conversions can be made within the remote_foreign_* calls and be done transparently to the modules. I'm sorta interested in this issue, and if my schedule allows it, I'll take a hack it at. > What kind of network transport does XML-RPC use? Does it make > an HTTP connection for each function call, or use some other > special protocol? It uses HTTP to transfer the XML back and forth; it's a lot like SOAP AFAICT. I need to read up on it a bit. Wil --=20 W. Reilly Cooley wc...@na... Naked Ape Consulting http://nakedape.cc irc.linux.com #orlug,#lnxs "There was a vague, unpleasant manginess about his appearence; he somehow seemed dirty, though a close glance showed him as carefully shaven as an actor, and clad in immaculate linen." -- H.L. Mencken, on the death of William Jennings Bryan |