From: Danny L. <li...@da...> - 2011-10-27 20:00:03
|
Am 27.10.2011 21:19, schrieb Jamie Cameron: > On 27/Oct/2011 09:25 Danny Löser <li...@da...> wrote .. >> Am 27.10.2011 17:28, schrieb Jamie Cameron: >>> On 27/Oct/2011 02:05 Danny Löser<li...@da...> wrote .. >>>> Hi, >>>> I have 2 questions: >>>> 1.) >>>> I send an email to a mailbox that by this mail the mail-quota limit >>>> would exceed. >>>> Then I get sent back an email with the message: >>>> >>>> Diagnostic-Code: x-unix; can't create user output file >>>> >>>> Is this normal and if not what's going wrong? >>> That doesn't look like the normal error message. I'd be interested to >>> know what gets logged to /var/log/procmail.log and /var/log/mail*log when >>> you send email to a mailbox like this.. >>> >>>> 2.) >>>> It is planned that I can, some time in the future, the users of >>>> Virtualmin in a MySQL database save instead of files? >>>> I know there is also LDAP, but that is not an option for me. >>> MySQL support isn't planned currently - the main issue is that Virtualmin >>> uses have to be Unix users, and there is no nss_mysql module that >>> can make this possible yet (unlike nss_ldap). >>> >>> - Jamie >> OK, in the mail.log is: >> Oct 27 17:54:31 dcp postfix/smtpd[6568]: connect from >> ipcop2.localdomain[192.168.2.1] >> Oct 27 17:54:31 dcp postfix/smtpd[6568]: 8757515360C1: >> client=ipcop2.localdomain[192.168.2.1] >> Oct 27 17:54:31 dcp postfix/cleanup[6571]: 8757515360C1: >> message-id=<4EA...@da...> >> Oct 27 17:54:31 dcp dkim-filter[2459]: 8757515360C1 DKIM verification >> successful >> Oct 27 17:54:31 dcp postfix/qmgr[2454]: 8757515360C1: >> from=<in...@da...>, size=2616130, nrcpt=1 (queue active) >> Oct 27 17:54:31 dcp postfix/smtpd[6568]: disconnect from >> ipcop2.localdomain[192.168.2.1] >> Oct 27 17:54:32 dcp postfix/local[6572]: 8757515360C1: >> to=<tes...@dc...>, orig_to=<te...@do...>, >> relay=local, delay=0.55, delays=0.39/0/0/0.16, dsn=5.2.0, >> status=bounced (can't create user output file) >> Oct 27 17:54:32 dcp postfix/cleanup[6571]: 191C915360E5: >> message-id=<201...@dc...> >> Oct 27 17:54:32 dcp postfix/bounce[6580]: 8757515360C1: sender >> non-delivery notification: 191C915360E5 >> Oct 27 17:54:32 dcp postfix/qmgr[2454]: 191C915360E5: from=<>, >> size=4515, nrcpt=1 (queue active) >> Oct 27 17:54:32 dcp postfix/bounce[6580]: 8757515360C1: postmaster >> non-delivery notification: 1986C15360E6 >> Oct 27 17:54:32 dcp postfix/qmgr[2454]: 8757515360C1: removed >> Oct 27 17:54:32 dcp postfix/smtp[6581]: 191C915360E5: >> to=<in...@da...>, relay=mail.dannypsilon.de[217.7.101.72]:25, >> delay=0.04, delays=0/0/0.02/0.01, dsn=2.0.0, status=sent (250 2.0.0 >> Ok: queued as 79681416001) >> Oct 27 17:54:32 dcp postfix/qmgr[2454]: 191C915360E5: removed >> >> and in the procmail.log is: >> Disk quota for test.domain2.de has been reached. >> procmail: Program failure (73) of >> "/etc/webmin/virtual-server/lookup-domain.pl" >> From in...@da... Thu Oct 27 17:54:31 2011 >> Subject: Fwd: Fwd: test >> Folder: /dev/null 2581019 >> Time:1319730872 From:in...@da... To:te...@do... >> User:test.domain2.de Size:2581020 Dest:/dev/null Mode:None >> >> To the second question again: >> OK, but it would be for some time in the future still desirable. > Actually, that looks like the correct behavior - if the user is over > or very close to quota, bouncing mail is the right thing to do. > > Ideally I'd like the message to say "over quota", but there is no way > to communicate a message from virtualmin to procmail to postfix that > gets included in the bounce :-( > > > > ------------------------------------------------------------------------------ > The demand for IT networking professionals continues to grow, and the > demand for specialized networking skills is growing even more rapidly. > Take a complimentary Learning@Cisco Self-Assessment and learn > about Cisco certifications, training, and career opportunities. > http://p.sf.net/sfu/cisco-dev2dev > > > - > Forwarded by the Webmin mailing list at web...@li... > To remove yourself from this list, go to > http://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/webadmin-list Well too bad, but I thought me that already. Well, maybe there someday someone thinks along with Postfix in this direction. This would be great. :-) |