|
From: Jamie C. <jca...@we...> - 2006-09-08 22:29:32
|
On 8/Sep/2006 15:07 Terry Allen wrote .. > Hi again, > In the Webmin logs, I spotted a couple of these attempts earlier today: > > [20/Aug/2006:20:44:55 +1000] [66.160.144.222] > /unauthenticated//../../../../../../../../../../../../../../../../../../../../../../../../../../../../../../../../../../../../../../../../etc/shadow > : File not found > > [20/Aug/2006:20:44:58 +1000] [66.160.144.222] > /unauthenticated/../../../../../../../../../../../../../../../../../../../../../../../../../../../../../../../../../../../../../../../../../../../../../../../../../../../../../../../../../../../../..//etc/passwd > : File not found > > Now the log quite clearly states that the file wasn't found, > but not having seen these before, I wonder is there anything I need > to nail down or what they are trying to achieve apart from trying to > get at the /etc files? Just make sure you are running Webmin 1.290 or later. If you had an older version, this attack may have managed to read your /etc/shadow file (in which case it wouldn't have reported 'file not found'). - Jamie |