|
From: Khan, M. [SMO] <MK...@fr...> - 2006-02-16 21:38:58
|
Hi Jamie,=20 I getting the following errors: Feb 16 13:37:09 dublx09 usermin(pam_unix)[31966]: check pass; user unknown Feb 16 13:37:09 dublx09 usermin(pam_unix)[31966]: authentication failure; l= ogname=3D uid=3D0 euid=3D0 tty=3D ruser=3D rhost=3D When login with ldap user. Please advise. Thanks -----Original Message----- From: web...@li... [mailto:web...@li...]On Behalf Of Jamie Cameron Sent: Wednesday, February 15, 2006 7:31 PM To: web...@li... Subject: RE: [webmin-l] Webmin Servers, Broadcast/scan On 16/Feb/2006 13:13 Neal Morgan wrote .. > Jamie: >=20 > Short answer: ethereal shows it still using port 10000 for broadcast. >=20 > Long answer: I first set the UDP port to 6789, ran a netstat to confirm > a listener was in place there are none existed on 10000, then ran the > broadcast. I looked into this some more, and found the cause of this problem - the sen= ding server isn't properly getting the UDP port to send to from it's own configu= ration. The work-around is to add the line=20 listen=3D6789 to the file /etc/webmin/servers/config on the sending system. =20 > On the multihome: the IPs resolve to different hosts and FQDNs. =20 >=20 > Both servers have 2 NICs: >=20 > 10.X.X.X/255.255.255.0=20 > 66.X.X.X/255.255.255.224 >=20 > Webmin broadcasts correctly to the expected two network addresses: >=20 > 10.X.X.255=20 > 66.X.X.223 >=20 > But it also adds in a broadcast to all networks, and a broadcast to the > 10 net as a class A: >=20 > 255.255.255.255 > 10.255.255.255 >=20 > Ethereal shows the 10.255.255.255 ignored (not on my network), the > 10.x.x.255 received by the first NIC, and the 66.X.X.223 and > 255.255.255.255 received by the second NIC. >=20 > So - it should receive 3 responses. Somehow, it is already de-duping > them and concluding there are 2 new servers to add. I'm OK with that - > except it uses the same host name and port for both. So, there is > nothing I can see from the edit screen that indicates why it thinks they > are different. =20 >=20 > Furthermore, if I broadcast again, I would expect it to either re-add > both, or add nothing. Instead, it adds just one of them! Every new > broadcast adds one more server with the same name, same config settings. >=20 >=20 > Hope that helps and wasn't too much information. Ok, I see what is going on how - Webmin isn't handling a packet being received twice from the same address in the same scan. This will be fixed in the next release though. - Jamie ------------------------------------------------------- This SF.net email is sponsored by: Splunk Inc. Do you grep through log files for problems? Stop! Download the new AJAX search engine that makes searching your log files as easy as surfing the web. DOWNLOAD SPLUNK! http://sel.as-us.falkag.net/sel?cmd=3Dlnk&kid=3D103432&bid=3D230486&dat=3D1= 21642 - Forwarded by the Webmin mailing list at web...@li... To remove yourself from this list, go to http://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/webadmin-list Notice: All email and instant messages (including attachments) sent to or from Franklin Templeton Investments (FTI) personnel may be retained, monitored and/or reviewed by FTI and its agents, or authorized law enforcement personnel, without further notice or consent. |