Re: [webmin-l] bind doesn't update slave & SPF

[Jamie C. <jca...@we...>]

On 20/Dec/2005 20:04 Unknown Questions wrote ..
> ----- Original Message ----- 
> From: "Jamie Cameron" <jca...@we...>
> To: <web...@li...>
> Sent: Monday, December 19, 2005 1:36 AM
> Subject: Re: [webmin-l] bind doesn't update slave & SPF
> 
> 
> > On Mon, 2005-12-19 at 09:43, Unknown Questions wrote:
> >> Hi Jamie
> >>
> >> i just wanted to highlight the 2 Bind problems i've spotted & mentioned
> >> in
> >> my previous post
> >> just in case you missed it when John was explaining the merits (or not)
> >> of
> >> using SPF records
> >>
> >> when i create or update a Master Bind record on server 1 and include
> an 
> >> SFP
> >> record
> >> that SPF / TXT record does NOT get sent across to / updated on the Slave
> >> Bind record on server 2
> >
> > I didn't see that discussion, but I'm not sure how this could be caused
> > by Webmin. The actual transfer of records from a master to slave is done
> > completely by BIND, and in all the instanced I have seen it either
> > transfers all records, or none of them.
> >
> 
> Hi Jamie
> 
> my original post said
> >>>
> looking at the slave bind record via
> https://slaveIP:10000/bind8/edit_slave.cgi?index=NNN
> it only shows the TXT record field as being empty
> 
> but looking at the slave bind record via
> https://slaveIP:10000/bind8/view_text.cgi?index=NNN&view=
> does show the line
> TXT "v=spf1 a mx ~all"
> <<<
> 
> so it would appear - as you said - that the SPF record *is* beign transferd
> across to the slave
> 
> but Webmin *is not* showing it in the Bind module

Ah .. you are right, that is definately a Webmin bug. I will fix this in the
next release..

 - Jamie