|
From: Barry <we...@i1...> - 2005-12-13 07:28:03
|
Unknown Questions wrote: > > *~* Barry Caplan says in the next posting to the effect that Cobalt > didn't quite get its easy / idiots guides in place even though they > identified it as a major requirement Actually, I meant Cobalt didn't complete its mission of creating a large line of server appliances, each of which could integrate with the others in some unifying fashion. I am sure the documentation was never quite complete either, but I was thinking larger then that...and frankly, our driving principle in the UI was that since no one was really going to RTFM anyway, everything should *just work* and they shouldn't need to RTFM. To make something really simple requires a really deep understanding of user needs and patterns, and information architecture, in order to match it to the system at hand. Frankly, there is no real reason, for task oriented approaches, that the user needs to know about system level stuff at all. It actually could be quite liberating to design a product that way - treat the systems already there as a core part of the overall system, but not the system itself. Let the system include, and even be driven by, parts that are closer to the end user. one thing I think was subtle and not really realized by many folks in the marketplace was that at Cobalt we never really marketed ourself as a Linux company even though we were arguable the most successful Linux company of all. Instead, we marketed ourselves as a solutions company, and the problems we were offering solutions to were couched in terms closer to the end user's point of view, and not Linux specific at all. That we chose Linux toimplement the solutions was a great decision, but we could have done the same thing using some other *Nix, or even Windows. We didn't want our customers to have to know what was under the hood anymore then (fill in your favorite auto manufacturer) wants its customers to know how to build a car or keep it tuned up, or worse, manufacture the actual metals form ores. We felt the much bigger market was going to expect and even demand that, even though the Linux sysadmins were our early adopters and very visible. Yet Webmin sometimes feels as though the limited sysadmin market is the *only* market it is aiming for, and that is to its detriment. Many parts of it come off feeling like the equivalent of having to learn how to smelt ore to build your own steel when all you want to do is drive a new car. If cars came that way, then very few of us would have cars, and frankly, far fewer webmin users exist then could if this was done with a different approach... IMHO. Best, Barry |