|
From: John H. <web...@ew...> - 2005-10-22 15:08:04
|
Jamie Cameron wrote: >This happens because Webmin doesn't detect CentOS 4.2 properly, due to the >removal of the /etc/centos-release file that existed on older versions. The best >fix would be to copy /etc/redhat-release to /etc/centos-release , and remove and >re-install Webmin. However, re-installing like that will cause all webmin and virtualmin >settings to be lost, so don't do it if you have any that you want to preserve! > >Alternatively, you can just go to the Webmin Configuration module, click on the Operating >System icon and change the OS manually to CentOS 4.2. > > - Jamie > >On 22/Oct/2005 23:26 Thomas E Dukes wrote .. > > >>Jamie, >> >>I noticed my network configuration module was missing. I deleted a few >>unused modules a couple of weeks ago and thought I might have inadvertently >>deleted it as well. So I went to the webmin site and downloaded it but >>was >>unable to install it because my OS was not supported?????? >> >>I'm running CentOS 4.2 based on RHEL 4. Whaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaasup? >> >>TIA >> >> >> Hmmm.... On a CentOS 4 (upgraded to 4.1), upgrade to 4.2, the OS is listed as 4.0 in webmin. On a fresh install of CentOS 4.2, it shows up as CentOS 4.2 in both redhat-release and webmin. Webmin put the Network Configuration module on both systems. But, maybe the fly in the soup here is trying to re-install a module that was removed? Looking for centos-release on a CentOS 3.5 install, I see the same thing... /etc/redhat-release and no /etc/centos-release. That would be the oldest I can check. I do recall the Whitebox replaced the redhat-release with wbel or whitebox-release. All of this I'm sure due to redhat trademark fears. It wouldn't surprise me if centos-release reappeared as so much else has been renamed that way, like all the redhat server management programs. Would it create various program confusion to have both redhat-release and centos-release in /etc? I bet so. I'm not complaining here.. only providing information. John Hinton |