RE: [webmin-l] Virtualmin/BIND template

[Jamie C. <jca...@we...>]

On Mon, 2005-10-03 at 10:43, Thomas E Dukes wrote:
>  
> > -----Original Message-----
> > From: web...@li... 
> > [mailto:web...@li...] On Behalf 
> > Of Jamie Cameron
> > Sent: Sunday, October 02, 2005 7:53 PM
> > To: web...@li...
> > Subject: Re: [webmin-l] Virtualmin/BIND template
> > 
> > On Mon, 2005-10-03 at 01:04, Thomas E Dukes wrote:
> > > Hello,
> > > 
> > > Apparently there have been some changes in virtualmin that 
> > I have not 
> > > noticed.
> > > 
> > > Previously, I'm sure VM was creating DNS records for 
> > virtual servers, 
> > > however now it is not.  In Server Tmplates under the BIND 
> > DNS records 
> > > for new domains, the box is now blank.  The checkbox, 
> > Record mode, Add 
> > > to automatically generated records is now checked.
> > 
> > That is the default setup. Basically, it means that 
> > Virtualmin will generate the DNS records automatically based 
> > on the features you select for a virtual server, and will not 
> > add any custom records. In 99% of cases, this is what most 
> > admins want..
> > 
> > > I guess this is OK but what is it?  Also, I noticed none of 
> > my virtual 
> > > servers are listed in named.conf.  Previously, they were.  I don't 
> > > know if these are related but everything is still working.
> > 
> > That's odd, they should be listed in named.conf . When adding 
> > the domain, did you select the 'Set up DNS zone?' option?
> > 
> It's been a while since I added a virtual host.   I'm sure I did the
> 'default' setup.  There are files in /var/named/ for the virtual hosts that
> virtualmin created.  I don't know what changed my named.conf but everything
> is still working.
> 
> The 'Set up DNS zone' is checked by default, but I don't have a template
> setup in the 'Server Template', never did.  Everything has always worked out
> of the box. I'm not sure what has stepped all-over my named.conf file.  I am
> running webmin 1.230 and virtualmin 2.604 on a CentOS 4.1 system running
> BIND 9.2.4.
> 
> I don't know if this is a problem but I thought it was very strange.
> 
> What should  I do?

If it's working, I wouldn't worry too much :-)
Perhaps the new zone is being added to an include file of named.conf ,
like /etc/named.conf.local  ?
 
 - Jamie