|
From: Craig W. <cra...@az...> - 2005-09-29 21:04:54
|
On Thu, 2005-09-29 at 13:12 -0700, Roger B.A. Klorese wrote: > Craig White wrote: > > On Wed, 2005-09-28 at 23:12 -0700, Roger B.A. Klorese wrote: > > > >> Craig White wrote: > >> > >>> My point - to be as succinct as I can be is that your statements - > >>> that MailScanner isn't appropriate to use with Postfix because of > >>> unanticipated changes to Postfix might break a working configuration > >>> is nothing but spreading unnecessary FUD. > >>> > >> And ours -- to be as succinct as can be -- is that if Postfix's author > >> says not to use MailScanner with Postfix, one would be silly to use it. > >> > > ---- > > Has Wietse actually made that statement? > > > > > > > He's said this: > ---- ok - thanks I've been using mailscanner for years and haven't had a problem though, probably only about 10 months or so in conjunction with Postfix. I'll keep my eye out but I have to say, I never could get amavisd or amavisd- new running but mailscanner was a breeze and very effective. Thanks Craig -- This message has been scanned for viruses and dangerous content by MailScanner, and is believed to be clean. |