|
From: Craig W. <cra...@az...> - 2005-09-29 17:15:24
|
On Wed, 2005-09-28 at 23:12 -0700, Roger B.A. Klorese wrote: > Craig White wrote: > > My point - to be as succinct as I can be is that your statements - > > that MailScanner isn't appropriate to use with Postfix because of > > unanticipated changes to Postfix might break a working configuration > > is nothing but spreading unnecessary FUD. > > > And ours -- to be as succinct as can be -- is that if Postfix's author > says not to use MailScanner with Postfix, one would be silly to use it. ---- Has Wietse actually made that statement? This is what is on Postfix.org's website mailscanner system, works with Postfix and other MTAs. This uses unsupported methods to manipulate Postfix queue files, and there are multiple reports of message duplication and/or delivery of truncated messages. That isn't the same thing. I haven't had an issue with multiple duplication or truncated messages. Craig -- This message has been scanned for viruses and dangerous content by MailScanner, and is believed to be clean. |