|
From: Roger B.A. K. <ro...@qu...> - 2005-09-18 22:25:43
|
Joe Cooper wrote: > On a package manager equipped system (i.e. RPM), this decision is up > to the package manager. That's not the whole story for Webmin, > though. Webmins RPM is a bit different than a standard RPM because it > has to run on many many many platforms and work correctly on all of > them....It makes a lot of decisions at install (and uninstall) time > that most packages don't make. But one thing it (or any other RPM) > can't do is ask questions. RPM has a standing law that a package > install and uninstall must be fully scriptable...and asking a question > kills that capability. Then you always preserve data on deinstall, and tell the user that data was kept and can be removed manually by <...>. > So, in short, there's no way to ask if the user intends to delete > configuration files in an RPM uninstall. There is probably a way to > make it not delete configuration files, though I'm not sure off-hand > what it is. Of course, if that had happened you would have > reinstalled only to find you had the same configuration problem you > had before and then you might be complaining because uninstalling > didn't actually uninstall everything! ;-) Um, since the problem was specifically that the previous production version did not properly set Webmin to restart on every boot, perhaps a simple fix for that problem should have been posted instead of "helpful" instructions to deinstall and reinstall. > There are a number of very good webmail packages available now (many > of which weren't so good when Usermin first came along), and we'll > likely support some of them in some kind of automated way for folks > who want an alternative, but none of them will ever look/feel/behave > in the same way as Webmin and Virtualmin and thus will always > introduce a new level of complexity to the overall system that doesn't > need to be there. Yes, but 99% of the users of email services would never see any other part of Webmin/Virtualmin -- only their web admins would. > Anyway, Usermin webmail is not a second-string part of the > system...It's going to be getting some pretty big improvements in the > next few weeks. I still don't see what it has to do with the "min" part of the name. |