|
From: Nathan K. <na...@ve...> - 2005-09-17 04:29:16
|
On Fri, Sep 16, 2005 at 06:05:06PM -0700, Barry wrote: > The beef, in a nutshell, is that doing so appears to be an unprecedented > interpretation of the GPL. > > I am willing to stand 100% corrected and say so publicly if someone > shows where this is an accepted interpretation of the GPL by the fsf, > and the gpl defense community as a whole. I appreciate your willingness to test the idea. I think both of us are more interested in learning what the actual answer is, rather to simply trying to convince people we are right. It's just that we are both equally convinced that we are right. So... Exactly what proof would you accept? I'm a little leary of the 'and' in your last sentence, since it would be hard to establish the 'as a whole' part. Is there an individual of suitable stature (employed or not by the FSF) whose opinion you would be willing to trust? And exactly which interpretation we are talking about? Can we state it as: "Assuming that a previous version of a body of code has been made available under the GPL, is it necessarily illegal for the undisputed owner of that code to offer to license a newly created derivative of that code under terms not compatible with the GPL?" Depending on your choice of arbitrator (and any revisions to the question), I'd be willing to wager up to $1,000 USD on a 'no' answer. The money would be escrowed in advance, you would win on a 'yes', and the bet would be cancelled on any answer requiring equivocation. Or I could also be happy with a smaller token bet if you would prefer. Nathan Kurz na...@ve... Joe: I realize this discussion isn't specific to Webmin, but I think it is a very important one. If future developers are afraid to license code under the GPL because of fear that it can then never be used under anything but the GPL, I fear it will harm the future of open source software. And if I'm wrong, well, it would be worth a considerable sum to me to find that out now. But if you really want this discussion to go away, request again and I'll disappear. |