Re: [Web-meetme-devel] Web-MeetMe suggestion

[Jason C. <jas...@ro...>]

Thanks for the reply Dan!
=20
I may attempt adding the feature myself on one of our development boxes =
and if i'm succesful i'll certainly let you and the web-meetme-devel =
list know what I added to make it work so it can be incorporated into a =
future release if you wish.
=20
Thanks again.
=20
Jason
=20

________________________________

From: Dan Austin [mailto:Dan...@Ph...]
Sent: Fri 1/12/2007 4:42 PM
To: Jason Craig
Cc: Web...@li...
Subject: RE: Web-MeetMe suggestion



It is not only feasible, it was an early design consideration.  I did =
not

actually implement it as we had more than enough connectivity.

=20

I can add it to me my list of desired features, but cannot estimate

a timeline to implement.  I tend to focus on features my users need

or want, with everything else left for when I have spare time.

=20

Dan

=20

From: Jason Craig [mailto:jas...@ro...]=20
Sent: Friday, January 12, 2007 1:04 PM
To: Dan Austin; ar...@gm...
Subject: Web-MeetMe suggestion

=20

Good afternoon guys,

=20

I first want to say you guys have done a great job on Web-MeetMe!  I've =
been testing it for a little while and will probably be rolling it out =
to our employees so they can schedule their own conferences and we can =
ditch our telco's conferencing and start hosting our own.

=20

I have a suggestion for a future release of Web-MeetMe.  What are the =
chances on adding a variable such as inside defines.php where the admin =
can define the total maximum number of channels/participants/ports that =
can simultaneously be used by all concurrent conferences.

=20

Ie. If a company wants to dedicate a PRI with 23 channels to =
conferencing, the maximum number of partipants could only be 23 =
(assuming they are all external).  When a user was adding a conference, =
before it gets added it checks to see if there are other conferences =
scheduled at the same time.  If there are it will only add the =
conference if the total of the previously scheduled conferences + the =
newly added participants is less than the system limit.  If its higher =
it will reject the request and possibly tell the user scheduling the =
conference there are not enough ports available.

=20

Is this something that's feasible?

=20

=20

Thanks,

=20

Jason

=20