From: ExsonQu <hex...@gm...> - 2013-12-17 08:58:48
|
*Dear all:* Can we change the length for stock category id from 6 to 20 and stock id from 20 t0 30? Thanks and best regards! Exson -- View this message in context: http://weberp-accounting.1478800.n4.nabble.com/Can-we-change-the-fields-length-tp4657090.html Sent from the web-ERP-developers mailing list archive at Nabble.com. |
From: Phil D. <ph...@lo...> - 2013-12-17 09:29:25
|
Hi Exson, Please could you describe the drivers for this proposal? I am not keen on the face of it because the stockid is shown on quite a lot of reports and space is often at a premium - all these reports would need re-writing. I think 20 varchar is ample for stockid and 6 fine for stock categories. This change probably belongs in the customers own branch - unless there is some logic I am missing. Phil Phil Daintree Logic Works Ltd - +64 (0)275 567890 http://www.logicworks.co.nz On 17/12/13 21:58, ExsonQu wrote: > *Dear all:* > > Can we change the length for stock category id from 6 to 20 > and stock id from 20 t0 30? > > Thanks and best regards! > > Exson > > > > -- > View this message in context: http://weberp-accounting.1478800.n4.nabble.com/Can-we-change-the-fields-length-tp4657090.html > Sent from the web-ERP-developers mailing list archive at Nabble.com. > > ------------------------------------------------------------------------------ > Rapidly troubleshoot problems before they affect your business. Most IT > organizations don't have a clear picture of how application performance > affects their revenue. With AppDynamics, you get 100% visibility into your > Java,.NET, & PHP application. Start your 15-day FREE TRIAL of AppDynamics Pro! > http://pubads.g.doubleclick.net/gampad/clk?id=84349831&iu=/4140/ostg.clktrk > _______________________________________________ > Web-erp-developers mailing list > Web...@li... > https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/web-erp-developers > |
From: Vitaly S. <vsh...@so...> - 2013-12-17 20:31:31
|
Hi all, I have all modifications done in my system to use 30 characters in stock id. I would love to to add them to the trunk, if you decided to adopt this proposal. Vitaly On 12/17/2013 3:29 AM, Phil Daintree wrote: > Hi Exson, > > Please could you describe the drivers for this proposal? > I am not keen on the face of it because > the stockid is shown on quite a lot of reports and space is often at a > premium - all these reports would need re-writing. > I think 20 varchar is ample for stockid and 6 fine for stock > categories. This change probably belongs in the customers own branch - > unless there is some logic I am missing. > > Phil > > Phil Daintree > Logic Works Ltd - +64 (0)275 567890 > http://www.logicworks.co.nz > > On 17/12/13 21:58, ExsonQu wrote: >> *Dear all:* >> >> Can we change the length for stock category id from 6 to 20 >> and stock id from 20 t0 30? >> >> Thanks and best regards! >> >> Exson >> >> >> >> -- >> View this message in context: http://weberp-accounting.1478800.n4.nabble.com/Can-we-change-the-fields-length-tp4657090.html >> Sent from the web-ERP-developers mailing list archive at Nabble.com. >> >> ------------------------------------------------------------------------------ >> Rapidly troubleshoot problems before they affect your business. Most IT >> organizations don't have a clear picture of how application performance >> affects their revenue. With AppDynamics, you get 100% visibility into your >> Java,.NET, & PHP application. Start your 15-day FREE TRIAL of AppDynamics Pro! >> http://pubads.g.doubleclick.net/gampad/clk?id=84349831&iu=/4140/ostg.clktrk >> _______________________________________________ >> Web-erp-developers mailing list >> Web...@li... >> https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/web-erp-developers >> > > ------------------------------------------------------------------------------ > Rapidly troubleshoot problems before they affect your business. Most IT > organizations don't have a clear picture of how application performance > affects their revenue. With AppDynamics, you get 100% visibility into your > Java,.NET, & PHP application. Start your 15-day FREE TRIAL of AppDynamics Pro! > http://pubads.g.doubleclick.net/gampad/clk?id=84349831&iu=/4140/ostg.clktrk > _______________________________________________ > Web-erp-developers mailing list > Web...@li... > https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/web-erp-developers > > > > ----- > No virus found in this message. > Checked by AVG - www.avg.com > Version: 2014.0.4259 / Virus Database: 3658/6925 - Release Date: 12/16/13 > > |
From: ExsonQu <hex...@gm...> - 2013-12-18 03:37:39
|
*Hi, Phil,* Thank you for your reply. Tim has a good explain for this. So I attached in the following. Thank you very much Tim. I think we should not increase the length of the categoryid. And according to Tim's information, I think we should try to avoid using the stock ID too. But I think it's a tough job as Phil said. I agree keep the current status. And thank you Vatily for your advice. It's better keep it as is for the benefit of users who use MRP features. Thank you all. I appreciated everyone's help from such a global community. It's a warm feeling! Best regards! Exson <quotation from Tim> Increasing the size of primary key fields increases the time the database engine takes to query those tables. There are already some parts of webERP that are unusable for large stockmaster tables (you showed me a report once and somebody else has mentioned MRP which slows exponentially as the size of stockmaster increases). I'm not sure I see a "use case" for this. I may be wrong but I can't remember anywhere in webERP that the user would actually see the category ID as opposed to the category name (except of course in the category maintenance screen) and if there is, it should be removed. Tim </quotation> -- View this message in context: http://weberp-accounting.1478800.n4.nabble.com/Can-we-change-the-fields-length-tp4657090p4657095.html Sent from the web-ERP-developers mailing list archive at Nabble.com. |