web-erp-developers

[WebERP-developers] TWIG and

[Phil D. <ph...@lo...>]

Icedlava - perhaps you could go a ahead with your proposal in the 
working copy - this may blow away some of serakfalcon's work but 
hopefully we could keep the tableview class in place to have a play with.

Serakfalcon's database work to me looks interesting. However, I am not 
up for a rewrite of the webERP code to make the other DBs work more 
efficiently due to limitations of their API. The Doctrine database 
abstraction appears to have a lot of code/scripts and abstraction at 
every turn - very clever stuff but I am really not sure about it. If 
there was some problem with mysql then perhaps it would be worth 
considering  - but I am not aware of a problem. The drivers are not 
strong enough to consider such a rewrite to me.

I would like to have a look at TWIG and icedlavas work.

Thanks



-------- Original Message --------
Subject: 	New Reply to Update on View Updates
Date: 	Fri, 04 Apr 2014 01:03:36 -0400
From: 	webERP Forum <in...@we...>
Reply-To: 	in...@we...
To: 	ph...@lo...



phil,

serakfalcon has just replied to a thread which you have subscribed to at webERP Forum. This thread is titled Update on View Updates.

Here is an excerpt of the message:
------------------------------------------
I updated Views to include Twig.

  I'll add Views to the working directory so you can try it out. It... (visit the thread to read more..)
------------------------------------------

To view the thread, you can go to the following URL:
http://www.weberp.org/forum/showthread.php?tid=2133&action=newpost

There may also be other replies to this thread but you will not receive anymore notifications until you visit the board again.

Thank you,
webERP Forum Staff

------------------------------------------
Unsubscription Information:

If you would not like to receive any more notifications of replies to this thread, visit the following URL in your browser:
http://www.weberp.org/forum/usercp2.php?action=removesubscription&tid=2133&key=a1f57630c1da5416c08f42f087e9b2a5&my_post_key=ccb046e3b721334d9e5f63cba4406f2a

------------------------------------------

Re: [WebERP-developers] TWIG and

[Jonathan (T. <th...@ic...>]

I would like to see what icedlava has, I can probably rework my code to fit
in since it's fairly modular. The table class can be separated from the
rest but it needs to be able to hook in to the header and footer to take
advantage of Datatables (and later jEditable- which would make the tables
editable in-place using AJAX) which is a lot easier with some sort of
template management system controlling output.

I posted my code with the general impression that getting things moving was
better than nothing, but I'm fine if it doesn't get used as-is or ends up
being changed in the end. Of course, I'm happy with it but I'd rather have
something everyone is happy with.

Also, beyond the table class, the forms class also adds a few things for
convenience. (For example, it would support a rotating FormID that changes
on every form submission and is form-specific, which would help prevent
attacks (I implemented this in a different project and could port the code
back into webERP if people are interested)), as well as selects that can
filter based on other selects. besides just making making forms easier.
Like the table class, the form class doesn't contain context, it just
expects to be fed information and displays that information. It should also
be optionally AJAX-able but I'll develop that in the other project I'm
working on and if it seems simple enough I can port it back.

There's also a menu class but I don't care about it as much as it pretty
much would only affect 1 file but it could lead to custom dashboards and
showing/hiding unused menu options on a per-user basis.

For Doctrine, the advantages will only really become obvious if we start
working with databases other than MySQL. It works, also the PDO file I
wrote works, you can add those as options and which theoretically expands
the amount of supported DB's by a factor of ~10 but that requires bringing
the install code in line with the rest of the project (right now it uses
mysqli specific code instead of going through the database wrapper, and
some functions use the ` symbol which is MySQL specific). So until that
happens it's true that it doesn't change much, and it's not a priority for
me.


On Sat, Apr 5, 2014 at 12:00 PM, Phil Daintree <ph...@lo...>wrote:

>  Icedlava - perhaps you could go a ahead with your proposal in the working
> copy - this may blow away some of serakfalcon's work but hopefully we could
> keep the tableview class in place to have a play with.
>
> Serakfalcon's database work to me looks interesting. However, I am not up
> for a rewrite of the webERP code to make the other DBs work more
> efficiently due to limitations of their API. The Doctrine database
> abstraction appears to have a lot of code/scripts and abstraction at every
> turn - very clever stuff but I am really not sure about it. If there was
> some problem with mysql then perhaps it would be worth considering  - but I
> am not aware of a problem. The drivers are not strong enough to consider
> such a rewrite to me.
>
> I would like to have a look at TWIG and icedlavas work.
>
> Thanks
>
>
>
> -------- Original Message --------  Subject: New Reply to Update on View
> Updates  Date: Fri, 04 Apr 2014 01:03:36 -0400  From: webERP Forum
> <in...@we...> <in...@we...>  Reply-To: in...@we...  To:
> ph...@lo...
>
> phil,
>
> serakfalcon has just replied to a thread which you have subscribed to at webERP Forum. This thread is titled Update on View Updates.
>
> Here is an excerpt of the message:
> ------------------------------------------
> I updated Views to include Twig.
>
>  I'll add Views to the working directory so you can try it out. It... (visit the thread to read more..)
> ------------------------------------------
>
> To view the thread, you can go to the following URL:http://www.weberp.org/forum/showthread.php?tid=2133&action=newpost
>
> There may also be other replies to this thread but you will not receive anymore notifications until you visit the board again.
>
> Thank you,
> webERP Forum Staff
>
> ------------------------------------------
> Unsubscription Information:
>
> If you would not like to receive any more notifications of replies to this thread, visit the following URL in your browser:http://www.weberp.org/forum/usercp2.php?action=removesubscription&tid=2133&key=a1f57630c1da5416c08f42f087e9b2a5&my_post_key=ccb046e3b721334d9e5f63cba4406f2a
>
> ------------------------------------------
>
>
>
>
>
>
> ------------------------------------------------------------------------------
>
> _______________________________________________
> Web-erp-developers mailing list
> Web...@li...
> https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/web-erp-developers
>
>

Re: [WebERP-developers] TWIG and

[opto <bu...@op...>]

you don't necessarily need datatables and jeditable in the header.

You only have to make sure it is loaded before $(''tabel').datatables is
called.

For my testing where I didn't want to touch core of web2project, I used an
ajax call to fetch it while waiting for the call to finish (is that
synchronous or asynchronus? - I always forget).

If you want more details, let me know.

I  think there are two edit plugins for datatables, the 'offical' one, which
is somewhat crippled (he wants to sell hos own solution), and an unofficial
one, also with custom editors and custom validation, which one can find by
google ( on github). (makeeditable). Seems to have more functionality.
Again, drop me a line if you need assistance to find it.

Klaus



--
View this message in context: http://weberp-accounting.1478800.n4.nabble.com/TWIG-and-tp4657324p4657348.html
Sent from the web-ERP-developers mailing list archive at Nabble.com.

[WebERP-developers] TWIG and

[Jon R <jr...@gm...>]

Hey Klaus, I know it doesn't need to be in the header but what i'm working
on moves all html outside the pages, and will automatically add the
functionality if forms or tables are flagged for ajax, all that needs to be
provided are the relevant element ids, also will need to process the data
after it is POSTed. It will make it simpler to deal with AJAX for other
things too.

Re: [WebERP-developers] TWIG and

[rfthomas <rf...@as...>]

For now we are using OpenVMS to host webERP.  Currently we can edit/maintain
webERP code directly on OpenVMS, changing to TWIG will eliminate such a
capability.  We would need to move all code maintenance to windows.  In
addition, there would be two sets of code that need to be maintained: the
TWIG code and the PHP code.  Since many would not have access to TWIG, their
changes would only be in PHP.

While there are benefits to TWIG, unless it can be universally used, the
added maintenance complexity does not appear worth the benefits.  Is there a
means to easily back PHP and HTML code changes into TWIG?

webERP is fast, the code is in general easy to read and modify.  Better
efforts might be made in eliminating duplicate code to be replaced with
subroutines or objects.

Bob Thomas



--
View this message in context: http://weberp-accounting.1478800.n4.nabble.com/TWIG-and-tp4657324p4657386.html
Sent from the web-ERP-developers mailing list archive at Nabble.com.

Re: [WebERP-developers] TWIG and

[Jonathan (T. <th...@ic...>]

Hey icedlava,
just wondering, do you have an eta on when you might be making the changes?
I'm starting work on jEditable (I think I've got it figured out, just need
to work out where the javascript should submit to (the api or the form
itself?)). I'm itching to get moving on this if possible.


On Sat, Apr 5, 2014 at 12:00 PM, Phil Daintree <ph...@lo...>wrote:

>  Icedlava - perhaps you could go a ahead with your proposal in the working
> copy - this may blow away some of serakfalcon's work but hopefully we could
> keep the tableview class in place to have a play with.
>
> Serakfalcon's database work to me looks interesting. However, I am not up
> for a rewrite of the webERP code to make the other DBs work more
> efficiently due to limitations of their API. The Doctrine database
> abstraction appears to have a lot of code/scripts and abstraction at every
> turn - very clever stuff but I am really not sure about it. If there was
> some problem with mysql then perhaps it would be worth considering  - but I
> am not aware of a problem. The drivers are not strong enough to consider
> such a rewrite to me.
>
> I would like to have a look at TWIG and icedlavas work.
>
> Thanks
>
>
>
> -------- Original Message --------  Subject: New Reply to Update on View
> Updates  Date: Fri, 04 Apr 2014 01:03:36 -0400  From: webERP Forum
> <in...@we...> <in...@we...>  Reply-To: in...@we...  To:
> ph...@lo...
>
> phil,
>
> serakfalcon has just replied to a thread which you have subscribed to at webERP Forum. This thread is titled Update on View Updates.
>
> Here is an excerpt of the message:
> ------------------------------------------
> I updated Views to include Twig.
>
>  I'll add Views to the working directory so you can try it out. It... (visit the thread to read more..)
> ------------------------------------------
>
> To view the thread, you can go to the following URL:http://www.weberp.org/forum/showthread.php?tid=2133&action=newpost
>
> There may also be other replies to this thread but you will not receive anymore notifications until you visit the board again.
>
> Thank you,
> webERP Forum Staff
>
> ------------------------------------------
> Unsubscription Information:
>
> If you would not like to receive any more notifications of replies to this thread, visit the following URL in your browser:http://www.weberp.org/forum/usercp2.php?action=removesubscription&tid=2133&key=a1f57630c1da5416c08f42f087e9b2a5&my_post_key=ccb046e3b721334d9e5f63cba4406f2a
>
> ------------------------------------------
>
>
>
>
>
>
> ------------------------------------------------------------------------------
>
> _______________________________________________
> Web-erp-developers mailing list
> Web...@li...
> https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/web-erp-developers
>
>