web-erp-developers

[Web-erp-developers] Reviews

[skaill <sk...@ro...>]

Phil, just wondering if you've pursued getting any reviews of webERP.  I =
mean, I know webERP obtained a fantastic 90's rating at Sourceforge long =
ago and has secured it ever since by many, many people around the world. =
 What I'm talking about here is additional reviews.  Thinking it may be =
a good idea to get some soon or eventually.

Reviews would hopefully give webERP a higher profile.  If the review had =
some negatives it would help our focus on that which will drive up its =
review ratings.

I would caution that we go slow and think hard in pursuing which =
"factions" review the product.  Some have vested interests in certain =
products that make them biased.  Also, I think we should get the project =
to a clean next version in terms of the development we are doing before =
pursuing reviews.

Steve  

Re: [Web-erp-developers] Reviews

[Stins, D. <DR...@Zi...>]

A list of references of companies using weberp would be nice too.


  ----- Original Message -----=20
  From: skaill=20
  To: web...@li...=20
  Sent: Tuesday, October 12, 2004 4:10 PM
  Subject: [Web-erp-developers] Reviews


  Phil, just wondering if you've pursued getting any reviews of webERP.  =
I mean, I know webERP obtained a fantastic 90's rating at Sourceforge =
long ago and has secured it ever since by many, many people around the =
world.  What I'm talking about here is additional reviews.  Thinking it =
may be a good idea to get some soon or eventually.

  Reviews would hopefully give webERP a higher profile.  If the review =
had some negatives it would help our focus on that which will drive up =
its review ratings.

  I would caution that we go slow and think hard in pursuing which =
"factions" review the product.  Some have vested interests in certain =
products that make them biased.  Also, I think we should get the project =
to a clean next version in terms of the development we are doing before =
pursuing reviews.

  Steve =20

Re: [Web-erp-developers] Reviews

[skaill <sk...@ro...>]

Yes, coming ;)  It's never good to list all but some key installations, =
references and variances...

Steve
  ----- Original Message -----=20
  From: Stins, Dick=20
  To: web...@li...=20
  Sent: Tuesday, October 12, 2004 12:09 PM
  Subject: Re: [Web-erp-developers] Reviews


  A list of references of companies using weberp would be nice too.


    ----- Original Message -----=20
    From: skaill=20
    To: web...@li...=20
    Sent: Tuesday, October 12, 2004 4:10 PM
    Subject: [Web-erp-developers] Reviews


    Phil, just wondering if you've pursued getting any reviews of =
webERP.  I mean, I know webERP obtained a fantastic 90's rating at =
Sourceforge long ago and has secured it ever since by many, many people =
around the world.  What I'm talking about here is additional reviews.  =
Thinking it may be a good idea to get some soon or eventually.

    Reviews would hopefully give webERP a higher profile.  If the review =
had some negatives it would help our focus on that which will drive up =
its review ratings.

    I would caution that we go slow and think hard in pursuing which =
"factions" review the product.  Some have vested interests in certain =
products that make them biased.  Also, I think we should get the project =
to a clean next version in terms of the development we are doing before =
pursuing reviews.

    Steve  

Re: [Web-erp-developers] Reviews

[Daintrees <p.d...@pa...>]

No I haven't asked anyone to reveiw it. I might be offended if they =
don't like it :-)

It's probably a good idea - folks need to here about the system if they =
are to use it.

Phil
  ----- Original Message -----=20
  From: skaill=20
  To: web...@li...=20
  Sent: Wednesday, October 13, 2004 3:10 AM
  Subject: [Web-erp-developers] Reviews


  Phil, just wondering if you've pursued getting any reviews of webERP.  =
I mean, I know webERP obtained a fantastic 90's rating at Sourceforge =
long ago and has secured it ever since by many, many people around the =
world.  What I'm talking about here is additional reviews.  Thinking it =
may be a good idea to get some soon or eventually.

  Reviews would hopefully give webERP a higher profile.  If the review =
had some negatives it would help our focus on that which will drive up =
its review ratings.

  I would caution that we go slow and think hard in pursuing which =
"factions" review the product.  Some have vested interests in certain =
products that make them biased.  Also, I think we should get the project =
to a clean next version in terms of the development we are doing before =
pursuing reviews.

  Steve  

Re: [Web-erp-developers] Reviews

[skaill <sk...@ro...>]

We can work on it in the future...and if/when you want...

Steve
  ----- Original Message -----=20
  From: Daintrees=20
  To: web...@li...=20
  Sent: Tuesday, October 12, 2004 2:13 PM
  Subject: Re: [Web-erp-developers] Reviews


  No I haven't asked anyone to reveiw it. I might be offended if they =
don't like it :-)

  It's probably a good idea - folks need to here about the system if =
they are to use it.

  Phil
    ----- Original Message -----=20
    From: skaill=20
    To: web...@li...=20
    Sent: Wednesday, October 13, 2004 3:10 AM
    Subject: [Web-erp-developers] Reviews


    Phil, just wondering if you've pursued getting any reviews of =
webERP.  I mean, I know webERP obtained a fantastic 90's rating at =
Sourceforge long ago and has secured it ever since by many, many people =
around the world.  What I'm talking about here is additional reviews.  =
Thinking it may be a good idea to get some soon or eventually.

    Reviews would hopefully give webERP a higher profile.  If the review =
had some negatives it would help our focus on that which will drive up =
its review ratings.

    I would caution that we go slow and think hard in pursuing which =
"factions" review the product.  Some have vested interests in certain =
products that make them biased.  Also, I think we should get the project =
to a clean next version in terms of the development we are doing before =
pursuing reviews.

    Steve