From: Stins, D. <DR...@Zi...> - 2004-07-27 12:26:00
|
see comments. Another license of a very successfull community is the the common public license of www.eclipse.org Dick ----- Original Message ----- From: "Phil Daintree" <ph...@du...> To: <web...@li...> Sent: Tuesday, July 27, 2004 5:01 AM Subject: Re: [Web-erp-developers] Lisencing > Do you not think there should be an obligation to contribute back any In gnu there is no obligation to contribute back. There is only a chance that someone wants to sell commercially built add-on's, but that is almost impossible because it violates the license. Or the other way around: When you have a commercial software package and want to integrate this with WEB-ERP, then it's very hard because your commercial software needs to be released as gnu too! That's why lot's of people avoid to use gnu software packages and do not build easy add-on's which start as a commercial customisation. They can't decide with the gnu license to contribute it later the project. The decision should be made beforehand the add-on's are developed. > developments. I really just want a right of refusal ie in most circumstances Contribution which you do not want to integrate with WEB-ERP, would be excellent to be published like oscommerce does: http://www.oscommerce.com/community/contributions > the specifics of a particular business will be such that I would not want to > build them in, but at least be given the opportunity to include them if > deemed appropriate. > > This stuff is kind of academic in many respects since you can download it - When WEB-ERP grows, then there are not many people who are able to maintain their own variants without an opensource community. The proof is: there is only one popular apache server, there is only one mozilla, there is only one compiere, > most folks will with nary a second thought. However, lets make it as easy as > possible - I did look at the Apache first version over the weekend I will > look at the mk II one. It basically looked like open slather - my only > caveat is that I want contributions back - I cant enforce this so maybe open > slather would encourage more feedback? The few contributions of code > received to date have been much appreciated but I would prefer more - what > is the best way to encourage that? Freedom, so no obligations! This will grow the number of installations of WEB-ERP and this will also grow the number of contributions. > > Phil > ----- Original Message ----- > From: "skaill" <sk...@ro...> > To: <web...@li...> > Sent: Tuesday, July 27, 2004 12:43 PM > Subject: Re: [Web-erp-developers] Lisencing > > > > I agree with Dick. > > > > I have done considerable reading over the past few days of several of the > > licenses and the principles of OSI. The Apache license seems to be the > > best. Not Apache Software License 1.1 created in 2000 but Apache License > > 2.0 created in 2004. It seems to be the most reasonable, thorough and > > designed to move Open Source forward in the quickest and best way. The > 2000 > > version was too open. GPL is extremely closed so that practically no one > > would ever want to do anything with a product having it. > > > > The newest version of GPL was created in 1991. I think Open Source has > come > > a long way since that time and some better licenses including Apache > exist. > > I think it is reasonable. It leads to maximum entities being involved and > > contributing. It protects original and derived works without forcing > every > > single thing done to be a contribution. I believe in choice and it allows > > choice to everyone while protecting that which already exists. > > > > That's just my opinion after reading it all over. > > > > The OSI and many licenses can be found at http://www.opensource.org/. > > > > Steve > > > > ----- Original Message ----- > > From: "Phil Daintree" <p.d...@pa...> > > To: <web...@li...> > > Sent: Sunday, July 25, 2004 10:46 AM > > Subject: Re: [Web-erp-developers] Lisencing > > > > > > > I will do a bit of reading Dick. > > > > > > Phil > > > > > > > > > On Sat, 2004-07-24 at 11:40, Stins, Dick wrote: > > > > Phil, > > > > > > > > I prefer a less restrictive license like mozilla, mit, apache or > > berkely. > > > > GNU is too hard to understand and you have a bigger chance to violate > it > > > > accidently. > > > > > > > > I guess it's also better to for the acceptance of web-erp when I see > the > > > > acceptance of projects like mozilla, apache and compiere. > > > > > > > > Dick > > > > ----- Original Message ----- > > > > From: "Daintrees" <p.d...@pa...> > > > > To: <web...@li...> > > > > Sent: Saturday, July 24, 2004 1:19 AM > > > > Subject: Re: [Web-erp-developers] Lisencing > > > > > > > > > > > > > I certainly wouldn't want a restrictive lisence - I am not into all > > the > > > > > legalise - I just want the system to be widely used and to be the > > best it > > > > > can be - encouraging developers to feedback their changes to the > > project > > > > > seems like a good way and to have this as a requirement of the > lisence > > > > makes > > > > > sense to me. The fact that it is completely unenforcable is a side > > issue! > > > > > > > > > > Phil > > > > > > > > > > ----- Original Message ----- > > > > > From: "skaill" <sk...@ro...> > > > > > To: <web...@li...> > > > > > Sent: Saturday, July 24, 2004 4:10 AM > > > > > Subject: Re: [Web-erp-developers] Lisencing > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > In regard to the GPL, I think I was reading about a newer and > better > > > > > > licensing that seems like a better encouragement for all to get > > involved > > > > > > including business yet keeps the necessary ingredients of the GPL. > > Have > > > > > you > > > > > > considered that license instead, Phil? I don't mean to be pushy, > > just > > > > > > asking. > > > > > > > > > > > > Steve > > > > > > > > > > > > ----- Original Message ----- > > > > > > From: "Phil Daintree" <ph...@du...> > > > > > > To: "Web ERP Developers" > <Web...@li...> > > > > > > Sent: Thursday, July 22, 2004 8:36 PM > > > > > > Subject: [Web-erp-developers] Lisencing > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > In reponse to Steve's question: > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >Having said that, if we run into a customer who has a > > multilanguage > > > > > > > requirement what are the concerns >under the licencing of us > > > > customizing > > > > > > > webERP as I've discussed for them? To my understanding that is > > >ok, > > > > > right? > > > > > > > Should I be asking this type of question here or in a different > > > > forum?! > > > > > > > >Having said that, if we run into a customer who has a > > multilanguage > > > > > > > requirement what are the concerns >under the licencing of us > > > > customizing > > > > > > > webERP as I've discussed for them? To my understanding that is > > >ok, > > > > > right? > > > > > > > Should I be asking this type of question here or in a different > > > > forum?! > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > I am pretty relaxed about all this stuff. I would prefer that > any > > > > > > > modifications made were at least offered back to the project for > > the > > > > > > benefit > > > > > > > of any others. However, I am aware of folks who just rip it off > > make > > > > > cool > > > > > > > modifications which they do not then include as open source and > > feel > > > > no > > > > > > > prick of conscience in doing so. Clearly my ability to police > the > > GPL > > > > is > > > > > > > pretty limited - I am much more interested in developing new > > > > > functionality > > > > > > > thats why I plead and beg for help in doing so. In terms of > > > > > multi-language > > > > > > > stuff which might compromise stability I didn't have the stomach > > for > > > > it > > > > > > when > > > > > > > Sherif and Hani wanted to have a go that's why Open Accounting > was > > > > > > started - > > > > > > > it looks like they are floundering with this project and it > makes > > me > > > > > > > particularly nervous in going down that track too. I think if > > anyone > > > > > could > > > > > > > have pulled it off those guys could and my preference would be > for > > > > > > resources > > > > > > > and help re language support to go to Open-Accounting rather > than > > > > > > > re-inventing the wheel with web-erp. > > > > > > > > > > > > > > I am not sure where they are up to with their project I think > they > > may > > > > > > have > > > > > > > re-written large chunks of web-erp in a more elegant way (from > the > > > > > > computer > > > > > > > scientist/purist perspective) - but I expect that it will not be > > so > > > > easy > > > > > > for > > > > > > > a business person to get their head into with classes and > > abstraction > > > > at > > > > > > > every turn. This is another aim of web-erp that I expect will be > > > > > > compromised > > > > > > > by Open-Accounting. The low bandwidth requirement aim has also > > been > > > > > > > steamrollered. However, I am still hoping it will re-surface as > a > > good > > > > > > > multi-language alternative. > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Phil > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > ------------------------------------------------------- > > > > > > > This SF.Net email is sponsored by BEA Weblogic Workshop > > > > > > > FREE Java Enterprise J2EE developer tools! > > > > > > > Get your free copy of BEA WebLogic Workshop 8.1 today. > > > > > > > http://ads.osdn.com/?ad_id=4721&alloc_id=10040&op=click > > > > > > > _______________________________________________ > > > > > > > Web-erp-developers mailing list > > > > > > > Web...@li... > > > > > > > https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/web-erp-developers > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > ------------------------------------------------------- > > > > > > This SF.Net email is sponsored by BEA Weblogic Workshop > > > > > > FREE Java Enterprise J2EE developer tools! > > > > > > Get your free copy of BEA WebLogic Workshop 8.1 today. > > > > > > http://ads.osdn.com/?ad_id=4721&alloc_id=10040&op=click > > > > > > _______________________________________________ > > > > > > Web-erp-developers mailing list > > > > > > Web...@li... > > > > > > https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/web-erp-developers > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > ------------------------------------------------------- > > > > > This SF.Net email is sponsored by BEA Weblogic Workshop > > > > > FREE Java Enterprise J2EE developer tools! > > > > > Get your free copy of BEA WebLogic Workshop 8.1 today. > > > > > http://ads.osdn.com/?ad_id=4721&alloc_id=10040&op=click > > > > > _______________________________________________ > > > > > Web-erp-developers mailing list > > > > > Web...@li... > > > > > https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/web-erp-developers > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > ------------------------------------------------------- > > > > This SF.Net email is sponsored by BEA Weblogic Workshop > > > > FREE Java Enterprise J2EE developer tools! > > > > Get your free copy of BEA WebLogic Workshop 8.1 today. > > > > http://ads.osdn.com/?ad_id=4721&alloc_id=10040&op=click > > > > _______________________________________________ > > > > Web-erp-developers mailing list > > > > Web...@li... > > > > https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/web-erp-developers > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > ------------------------------------------------------- > > > This SF.Net email is sponsored by BEA Weblogic Workshop > > > FREE Java Enterprise J2EE developer tools! > > > Get your free copy of BEA WebLogic Workshop 8.1 today. > > > http://ads.osdn.com/?ad_id=4721&alloc_id=10040&op=click > > > _______________________________________________ > > > Web-erp-developers mailing list > > > Web...@li... > > > https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/web-erp-developers > > > > > > > > ------------------------------------------------------- > > This SF.Net email is sponsored by BEA Weblogic Workshop > > FREE Java Enterprise J2EE developer tools! > > Get your free copy of BEA WebLogic Workshop 8.1 today. > > http://ads.osdn.com/?ad_id=4721&alloc_id=10040&op=click > > _______________________________________________ > > Web-erp-developers mailing list > > Web...@li... > > https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/web-erp-developers > > > > > > ------------------------------------------------------- > This SF.Net email is sponsored by BEA Weblogic Workshop > FREE Java Enterprise J2EE developer tools! > Get your free copy of BEA WebLogic Workshop 8.1 today. > http://ads.osdn.com/?ad_id=4721&alloc_id=10040&op=click > _______________________________________________ > Web-erp-developers mailing list > Web...@li... > https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/web-erp-developers |
From: skaill <sk...@ro...> - 2004-07-27 20:04:42
|
The contributions area could be a good idea for webERP. For instance, many example reports, themes, possibly even code for various databases other than mysql and much more could end up contributed. Steve ----- Original Message ----- From: "Stins, Dick" <DR...@Zi...> To: <web...@li...> Sent: Tuesday, July 27, 2004 5:00 AM Subject: Re: [Web-erp-developers] Lisencing > see comments. > > Another license of a very successfull community is the the common public > license of www.eclipse.org > > Dick > ----- Original Message ----- > From: "Phil Daintree" <ph...@du...> > To: <web...@li...> > Sent: Tuesday, July 27, 2004 5:01 AM > Subject: Re: [Web-erp-developers] Lisencing > > > > Do you not think there should be an obligation to contribute back any > In gnu there is no obligation to contribute back. There is only a chance > that someone wants to sell commercially built add-on's, but that is almost > impossible because it violates the license. > Or the other way around: When you have a commercial software package and > want to integrate this with WEB-ERP, then it's very hard because your > commercial software needs to be released as gnu too! > That's why lot's of people avoid to use gnu software packages and do not > build easy add-on's which start as a commercial customisation. They can't > decide with the gnu license to contribute it later the project. The decision > should be made beforehand the add-on's are developed. > > developments. I really just want a right of refusal ie in most > circumstances > Contribution which you do not want to integrate with WEB-ERP, would be > excellent to be published like oscommerce does: > http://www.oscommerce.com/community/contributions > > the specifics of a particular business will be such that I would not want > to > > build them in, but at least be given the opportunity to include them if > > deemed appropriate. > > > > This stuff is kind of academic in many respects since you can download > it - > When WEB-ERP grows, then there are not many people who are able to maintain > their own variants without an opensource community. The proof is: there is > only one popular apache server, there is only one mozilla, there is only one > compiere, > > most folks will with nary a second thought. However, lets make it as easy > as > > possible - I did look at the Apache first version over the weekend I will > > look at the mk II one. It basically looked like open slather - my only > > caveat is that I want contributions back - I cant enforce this so maybe > open > > slather would encourage more feedback? The few contributions of code > > received to date have been much appreciated but I would prefer more - what > > is the best way to encourage that? > Freedom, so no obligations! This will grow the number of installations of > WEB-ERP and this will also grow the number of contributions. > > > > > Phil > > ----- Original Message ----- > > From: "skaill" <sk...@ro...> > > To: <web...@li...> > > Sent: Tuesday, July 27, 2004 12:43 PM > > Subject: Re: [Web-erp-developers] Lisencing > > > > > > > I agree with Dick. > > > > > > I have done considerable reading over the past few days of several of > the > > > licenses and the principles of OSI. The Apache license seems to be the > > > best. Not Apache Software License 1.1 created in 2000 but Apache > License > > > 2.0 created in 2004. It seems to be the most reasonable, thorough and > > > designed to move Open Source forward in the quickest and best way. The > > 2000 > > > version was too open. GPL is extremely closed so that practically no > one > > > would ever want to do anything with a product having it. > > > > > > The newest version of GPL was created in 1991. I think Open Source has > > come > > > a long way since that time and some better licenses including Apache > > exist. > > > I think it is reasonable. It leads to maximum entities being involved > and > > > contributing. It protects original and derived works without forcing > > every > > > single thing done to be a contribution. I believe in choice and it > allows > > > choice to everyone while protecting that which already exists. > > > > > > That's just my opinion after reading it all over. > > > > > > The OSI and many licenses can be found at http://www.opensource.org/. > > > > > > Steve > > > > > > ----- Original Message ----- > > > From: "Phil Daintree" <p.d...@pa...> > > > To: <web...@li...> > > > Sent: Sunday, July 25, 2004 10:46 AM > > > Subject: Re: [Web-erp-developers] Lisencing > > > > > > > > > > I will do a bit of reading Dick. > > > > > > > > Phil > > > > > > > > > > > > On Sat, 2004-07-24 at 11:40, Stins, Dick wrote: > > > > > Phil, > > > > > > > > > > I prefer a less restrictive license like mozilla, mit, apache or > > > berkely. > > > > > GNU is too hard to understand and you have a bigger chance to > violate > > it > > > > > accidently. > > > > > > > > > > I guess it's also better to for the acceptance of web-erp when I see > > the > > > > > acceptance of projects like mozilla, apache and compiere. > > > > > > > > > > Dick > > > > > ----- Original Message ----- > > > > > From: "Daintrees" <p.d...@pa...> > > > > > To: <web...@li...> > > > > > Sent: Saturday, July 24, 2004 1:19 AM > > > > > Subject: Re: [Web-erp-developers] Lisencing > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > I certainly wouldn't want a restrictive lisence - I am not into > all > > > the > > > > > > legalise - I just want the system to be widely used and to be the > > > best it > > > > > > can be - encouraging developers to feedback their changes to the > > > project > > > > > > seems like a good way and to have this as a requirement of the > > lisence > > > > > makes > > > > > > sense to me. The fact that it is completely unenforcable is a side > > > issue! > > > > > > > > > > > > Phil > > > > > > > > > > > > ----- Original Message ----- > > > > > > From: "skaill" <sk...@ro...> > > > > > > To: <web...@li...> > > > > > > Sent: Saturday, July 24, 2004 4:10 AM > > > > > > Subject: Re: [Web-erp-developers] Lisencing > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > In regard to the GPL, I think I was reading about a newer and > > better > > > > > > > licensing that seems like a better encouragement for all to get > > > involved > > > > > > > including business yet keeps the necessary ingredients of the > GPL. > > > Have > > > > > > you > > > > > > > considered that license instead, Phil? I don't mean to be > pushy, > > > just > > > > > > > asking. > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Steve > > > > > > > > > > > > > > ----- Original Message ----- > > > > > > > From: "Phil Daintree" <ph...@du...> > > > > > > > To: "Web ERP Developers" > > <Web...@li...> > > > > > > > Sent: Thursday, July 22, 2004 8:36 PM > > > > > > > Subject: [Web-erp-developers] Lisencing > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > In reponse to Steve's question: > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >Having said that, if we run into a customer who has a > > > multilanguage > > > > > > > > requirement what are the concerns >under the licencing of us > > > > > customizing > > > > > > > > webERP as I've discussed for them? To my understanding that is > > > >ok, > > > > > > right? > > > > > > > > Should I be asking this type of question here or in a > different > > > > > forum?! > > > > > > > > >Having said that, if we run into a customer who has a > > > multilanguage > > > > > > > > requirement what are the concerns >under the licencing of us > > > > > customizing > > > > > > > > webERP as I've discussed for them? To my understanding that is > > > >ok, > > > > > > right? > > > > > > > > Should I be asking this type of question here or in a > different > > > > > forum?! > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > I am pretty relaxed about all this stuff. I would prefer that > > any > > > > > > > > modifications made were at least offered back to the project > for > > > the > > > > > > > benefit > > > > > > > > of any others. However, I am aware of folks who just rip it > off > > > make > > > > > > cool > > > > > > > > modifications which they do not then include as open source > and > > > feel > > > > > no > > > > > > > > prick of conscience in doing so. Clearly my ability to police > > the > > > GPL > > > > > is > > > > > > > > pretty limited - I am much more interested in developing new > > > > > > functionality > > > > > > > > thats why I plead and beg for help in doing so. In terms of > > > > > > multi-language > > > > > > > > stuff which might compromise stability I didn't have the > stomach > > > for > > > > > it > > > > > > > when > > > > > > > > Sherif and Hani wanted to have a go that's why Open Accounting > > was > > > > > > > started - > > > > > > > > it looks like they are floundering with this project and it > > makes > > > me > > > > > > > > particularly nervous in going down that track too. I think if > > > anyone > > > > > > could > > > > > > > > have pulled it off those guys could and my preference would be > > for > > > > > > > resources > > > > > > > > and help re language support to go to Open-Accounting rather > > than > > > > > > > > re-inventing the wheel with web-erp. > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > I am not sure where they are up to with their project I think > > they > > > may > > > > > > > have > > > > > > > > re-written large chunks of web-erp in a more elegant way (from > > the > > > > > > > computer > > > > > > > > scientist/purist perspective) - but I expect that it will not > be > > > so > > > > > easy > > > > > > > for > > > > > > > > a business person to get their head into with classes and > > > abstraction > > > > > at > > > > > > > > every turn. This is another aim of web-erp that I expect will > be > > > > > > > compromised > > > > > > > > by Open-Accounting. The low bandwidth requirement aim has also > > > been > > > > > > > > steamrollered. However, I am still hoping it will re-surface > as > > a > > > good > > > > > > > > multi-language alternative. > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Phil > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > ------------------------------------------------------- > > > > > > > > This SF.Net email is sponsored by BEA Weblogic Workshop > > > > > > > > FREE Java Enterprise J2EE developer tools! > > > > > > > > Get your free copy of BEA WebLogic Workshop 8.1 today. > > > > > > > > http://ads.osdn.com/?ad_id=4721&alloc_id=10040&op=click > > > > > > > > _______________________________________________ > > > > > > > > Web-erp-developers mailing list > > > > > > > > Web...@li... > > > > > > > > > https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/web-erp-developers > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > ------------------------------------------------------- > > > > > > > This SF.Net email is sponsored by BEA Weblogic Workshop > > > > > > > FREE Java Enterprise J2EE developer tools! > > > > > > > Get your free copy of BEA WebLogic Workshop 8.1 today. > > > > > > > http://ads.osdn.com/?ad_id=4721&alloc_id=10040&op=click > > > > > > > _______________________________________________ > > > > > > > Web-erp-developers mailing list > > > > > > > Web...@li... > > > > > > > https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/web-erp-developers > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > ------------------------------------------------------- > > > > > > This SF.Net email is sponsored by BEA Weblogic Workshop > > > > > > FREE Java Enterprise J2EE developer tools! > > > > > > Get your free copy of BEA WebLogic Workshop 8.1 today. > > > > > > http://ads.osdn.com/?ad_id=4721&alloc_id=10040&op=click > > > > > > _______________________________________________ > > > > > > Web-erp-developers mailing list > > > > > > Web...@li... > > > > > > https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/web-erp-developers > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > ------------------------------------------------------- > > > > > This SF.Net email is sponsored by BEA Weblogic Workshop > > > > > FREE Java Enterprise J2EE developer tools! > > > > > Get your free copy of BEA WebLogic Workshop 8.1 today. > > > > > http://ads.osdn.com/?ad_id=4721&alloc_id=10040&op=click > > > > > _______________________________________________ > > > > > Web-erp-developers mailing list > > > > > Web...@li... > > > > > https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/web-erp-developers > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > ------------------------------------------------------- > > > > This SF.Net email is sponsored by BEA Weblogic Workshop > > > > FREE Java Enterprise J2EE developer tools! > > > > Get your free copy of BEA WebLogic Workshop 8.1 today. > > > > http://ads.osdn.com/?ad_id=4721&alloc_id=10040&op=click > > > > _______________________________________________ > > > > Web-erp-developers mailing list > > > > Web...@li... > > > > https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/web-erp-developers > > > > > > > > > > > > ------------------------------------------------------- > > > This SF.Net email is sponsored by BEA Weblogic Workshop > > > FREE Java Enterprise J2EE developer tools! > > > Get your free copy of BEA WebLogic Workshop 8.1 today. > > > http://ads.osdn.com/?ad_id=4721&alloc_id=10040&op=click > > > _______________________________________________ > > > Web-erp-developers mailing list > > > Web...@li... > > > https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/web-erp-developers > > > > > > > > > > > ------------------------------------------------------- > > This SF.Net email is sponsored by BEA Weblogic Workshop > > FREE Java Enterprise J2EE developer tools! > > Get your free copy of BEA WebLogic Workshop 8.1 today. > > http://ads.osdn.com/?ad_id=4721&alloc_id=10040&op=click > > _______________________________________________ > > Web-erp-developers mailing list > > Web...@li... > > https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/web-erp-developers > > > > > ------------------------------------------------------- > This SF.Net email is sponsored by BEA Weblogic Workshop > FREE Java Enterprise J2EE developer tools! > Get your free copy of BEA WebLogic Workshop 8.1 today. > http://ads.osdn.com/?ad_id=4721&alloc_id=10040&op=click > _______________________________________________ > Web-erp-developers mailing list > Web...@li... > https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/web-erp-developers |
From: Stins, D. <DR...@Zi...> - 2004-07-27 12:26:00
|
I prefer a license which enables to integrate/interface WEB-ERP with other licenses (commercial, open source) or customise it and distribute it with additional (commercial) license conditions. I am not sure which license covers that the best. Dick ----- Original Message ----- From: "skaill" <sk...@ro...> To: <web...@li...> Sent: Tuesday, July 27, 2004 2:43 AM Subject: Re: [Web-erp-developers] Lisencing > I agree with Dick. > > I have done considerable reading over the past few days of several of the > licenses and the principles of OSI. The Apache license seems to be the > best. Not Apache Software License 1.1 created in 2000 but Apache License > 2.0 created in 2004. It seems to be the most reasonable, thorough and > designed to move Open Source forward in the quickest and best way. The 2000 > version was too open. GPL is extremely closed so that practically no one > would ever want to do anything with a product having it. > > The newest version of GPL was created in 1991. I think Open Source has come > a long way since that time and some better licenses including Apache exist. > I think it is reasonable. It leads to maximum entities being involved and > contributing. It protects original and derived works without forcing every > single thing done to be a contribution. I believe in choice and it allows > choice to everyone while protecting that which already exists. > > That's just my opinion after reading it all over. > > The OSI and many licenses can be found at http://www.opensource.org/. > > Steve > > ----- Original Message ----- > From: "Phil Daintree" <p.d...@pa...> > To: <web...@li...> > Sent: Sunday, July 25, 2004 10:46 AM > Subject: Re: [Web-erp-developers] Lisencing > > > > I will do a bit of reading Dick. > > > > Phil > > > > > > On Sat, 2004-07-24 at 11:40, Stins, Dick wrote: > > > Phil, > > > > > > I prefer a less restrictive license like mozilla, mit, apache or > berkely. > > > GNU is too hard to understand and you have a bigger chance to violate it > > > accidently. > > > > > > I guess it's also better to for the acceptance of web-erp when I see the > > > acceptance of projects like mozilla, apache and compiere. > > > > > > Dick > > > ----- Original Message ----- > > > From: "Daintrees" <p.d...@pa...> > > > To: <web...@li...> > > > Sent: Saturday, July 24, 2004 1:19 AM > > > Subject: Re: [Web-erp-developers] Lisencing > > > > > > > > > > I certainly wouldn't want a restrictive lisence - I am not into all > the > > > > legalise - I just want the system to be widely used and to be the > best it > > > > can be - encouraging developers to feedback their changes to the > project > > > > seems like a good way and to have this as a requirement of the lisence > > > makes > > > > sense to me. The fact that it is completely unenforcable is a side > issue! > > > > > > > > Phil > > > > > > > > ----- Original Message ----- > > > > From: "skaill" <sk...@ro...> > > > > To: <web...@li...> > > > > Sent: Saturday, July 24, 2004 4:10 AM > > > > Subject: Re: [Web-erp-developers] Lisencing > > > > > > > > > > > > > In regard to the GPL, I think I was reading about a newer and better > > > > > licensing that seems like a better encouragement for all to get > involved > > > > > including business yet keeps the necessary ingredients of the GPL. > Have > > > > you > > > > > considered that license instead, Phil? I don't mean to be pushy, > just > > > > > asking. > > > > > > > > > > Steve > > > > > > > > > > ----- Original Message ----- > > > > > From: "Phil Daintree" <ph...@du...> > > > > > To: "Web ERP Developers" <Web...@li...> > > > > > Sent: Thursday, July 22, 2004 8:36 PM > > > > > Subject: [Web-erp-developers] Lisencing > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > In reponse to Steve's question: > > > > > > > > > > > > >Having said that, if we run into a customer who has a > multilanguage > > > > > > requirement what are the concerns >under the licencing of us > > > customizing > > > > > > webERP as I've discussed for them? To my understanding that is > >ok, > > > > right? > > > > > > Should I be asking this type of question here or in a different > > > forum?! > > > > > > >Having said that, if we run into a customer who has a > multilanguage > > > > > > requirement what are the concerns >under the licencing of us > > > customizing > > > > > > webERP as I've discussed for them? To my understanding that is > >ok, > > > > right? > > > > > > Should I be asking this type of question here or in a different > > > forum?! > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > I am pretty relaxed about all this stuff. I would prefer that any > > > > > > modifications made were at least offered back to the project for > the > > > > > benefit > > > > > > of any others. However, I am aware of folks who just rip it off > make > > > > cool > > > > > > modifications which they do not then include as open source and > feel > > > no > > > > > > prick of conscience in doing so. Clearly my ability to police the > GPL > > > is > > > > > > pretty limited - I am much more interested in developing new > > > > functionality > > > > > > thats why I plead and beg for help in doing so. In terms of > > > > multi-language > > > > > > stuff which might compromise stability I didn't have the stomach > for > > > it > > > > > when > > > > > > Sherif and Hani wanted to have a go that's why Open Accounting was > > > > > started - > > > > > > it looks like they are floundering with this project and it makes > me > > > > > > particularly nervous in going down that track too. I think if > anyone > > > > could > > > > > > have pulled it off those guys could and my preference would be for > > > > > resources > > > > > > and help re language support to go to Open-Accounting rather than > > > > > > re-inventing the wheel with web-erp. > > > > > > > > > > > > I am not sure where they are up to with their project I think they > may > > > > > have > > > > > > re-written large chunks of web-erp in a more elegant way (from the > > > > > computer > > > > > > scientist/purist perspective) - but I expect that it will not be > so > > > easy > > > > > for > > > > > > a business person to get their head into with classes and > abstraction > > > at > > > > > > every turn. This is another aim of web-erp that I expect will be > > > > > compromised > > > > > > by Open-Accounting. The low bandwidth requirement aim has also > been > > > > > > steamrollered. However, I am still hoping it will re-surface as a > good > > > > > > multi-language alternative. > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Phil > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > ------------------------------------------------------- > > > > > > This SF.Net email is sponsored by BEA Weblogic Workshop > > > > > > FREE Java Enterprise J2EE developer tools! > > > > > > Get your free copy of BEA WebLogic Workshop 8.1 today. > > > > > > http://ads.osdn.com/?ad_id=4721&alloc_id=10040&op=click > > > > > > _______________________________________________ > > > > > > Web-erp-developers mailing list > > > > > > Web...@li... > > > > > > https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/web-erp-developers > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > ------------------------------------------------------- > > > > > This SF.Net email is sponsored by BEA Weblogic Workshop > > > > > FREE Java Enterprise J2EE developer tools! > > > > > Get your free copy of BEA WebLogic Workshop 8.1 today. > > > > > http://ads.osdn.com/?ad_id=4721&alloc_id=10040&op=click > > > > > _______________________________________________ > > > > > Web-erp-developers mailing list > > > > > Web...@li... > > > > > https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/web-erp-developers > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > ------------------------------------------------------- > > > > This SF.Net email is sponsored by BEA Weblogic Workshop > > > > FREE Java Enterprise J2EE developer tools! > > > > Get your free copy of BEA WebLogic Workshop 8.1 today. > > > > http://ads.osdn.com/?ad_id=4721&alloc_id=10040&op=click > > > > _______________________________________________ > > > > Web-erp-developers mailing list > > > > Web...@li... > > > > https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/web-erp-developers > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > ------------------------------------------------------- > > > This SF.Net email is sponsored by BEA Weblogic Workshop > > > FREE Java Enterprise J2EE developer tools! > > > Get your free copy of BEA WebLogic Workshop 8.1 today. > > > http://ads.osdn.com/?ad_id=4721&alloc_id=10040&op=click > > > _______________________________________________ > > > Web-erp-developers mailing list > > > Web...@li... > > > https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/web-erp-developers > > > > > > > > > > > ------------------------------------------------------- > > This SF.Net email is sponsored by BEA Weblogic Workshop > > FREE Java Enterprise J2EE developer tools! > > Get your free copy of BEA WebLogic Workshop 8.1 today. > > http://ads.osdn.com/?ad_id=4721&alloc_id=10040&op=click > > _______________________________________________ > > Web-erp-developers mailing list > > Web...@li... > > https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/web-erp-developers > > > > ------------------------------------------------------- > This SF.Net email is sponsored by BEA Weblogic Workshop > FREE Java Enterprise J2EE developer tools! > Get your free copy of BEA WebLogic Workshop 8.1 today. > http://ads.osdn.com/?ad_id=4721&alloc_id=10040&op=click > _______________________________________________ > Web-erp-developers mailing list > Web...@li... > https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/web-erp-developers |
From: Daintrees <p.d...@pa...> - 2004-07-23 23:39:27
|
> > If I may comment on the need for alternate interfaces I believe there are > many reasons. You may want to change the interface to be better for certain > devices such as the wireless group. Possibly for handicapped, especially > blind. Multilanguage we've discussed. Maybe just because people want to > customize the interface for the particular work they do. Sometimes a > company may want ONLY certain options appearing for the shipper or for the > accounts receivable clerk. Yes, security restricts then but options plus > on-the-fly context based interface changing can be more effective is several > situations. I think it is relatively easy to create these specialised screens with a little cut and paste - I imagine it is something like this that Chris has done to get his wireless system going. > > Having said this, it is still most important to be able to rely on the > system and be able for as many people to easily code within it without > mistakes and confusion. Congratulations to Phil and the group here for > achieving and retaining that primary goal. While I believe in 3 tier > (database, business rules and front end) where it makes good sense, there > are times when maybe it is good theory or a compromise between both > approaches is the best alternative. Sometimes I have found also that 3 > tiered using higher technology inherently ends up slowing the code down and > overcomplicates the contextual reading/understanding of it. > > Steve Wow ... I have never had anyone actually agree with my controversial thoughts on this. Thanks for your support Steve. Phil |
From: Daintrees <p.d...@pa...> - 2004-07-28 07:15:27
|
Just to clarify one point in here .... > that outmoded or not GPL makes sense - my limited understanding is that this > says .... > > I am happy for anyone to take the system and use it as is. > I am happy for anyone to distribute and support it and natrually charge a fee for their support and/or distribution/marketing of web-erp > If a user or distributor develops/extends any additional functionality on > top of the existing system then I think that by using it this should carry > an obligation/requirement to give back to the project. Its not much to ask, > is it? > If a user/developer wishes to develop commercial software that they charge > for then they should not be starting off with web-erp and developing > embracing/extending from it - it is open-source software ... always will be. > Phil |