Re: [Web-erp-developers] Doc Manager

[Daintrees <p.d...@pa...>]

These items in this list are still to do and they are still important. =
The GL reporting is still weak, we need work orders. We need a direct =
credit facility for creditor payments. The fact that priorities are =
pushed elsewhere is interesting, but these jobs are still outstanding, I =
agree that because they are old it reflects poorly. However, I think it =
is very important that the functionality not available is also very =
visible. We dont want people investing a lot of time in a system that =
doesn't do what they need. When there is a lot of functionality now in =
the system it is easier to look at what is not available from a =
manager's perspective.=20

I realise this is counter to traditional marketing theory. However, we =
really should value people's time and this is a quick way for them to =
see if they can live with the stuff lacking.

Phil
  ----- Original Message -----=20
  From: skaill=20
  To: web...@li...=20
  Sent: Monday, October 18, 2004 3:58 AM
  Subject: Fw: [Web-erp-developers] Doc Manager


  Or possibly not old but doesn't seem to show the priority items we are =
currently working on.

  Steve

  ----- Original Message -----=20
  From: skaill=20
  To: web...@li...=20
  Sent: Sunday, October 17, 2004 10:55 AM
  Subject: [Web-erp-developers] Doc Manager


  Phil, in the Doc Manger on our Sourceforge area there is a very old =
document called WEB-ERP Project To Do.  Might want to eliminate it or =
put a new one up there.  That one will give the impression that web-erp =
can't do anything yet instead of the robust system it has become.

  Steve