From: Jake S. <ns...@us...> - 2004-09-20 20:59:15
|
I can help do some scripts, if it is simply a case of putting _() around echo statements, then I am sure if you send me a batch of scripts (ie there names) to do I could find some time this week to convert some. Jake skaill wrote: >We need everyone including myself to dive back into getting the >Multilanguage done. I could do at least 20 scripts in a day but I might be >crazy by the end of it! > >Steve > >----- Original Message ----- >From: "Daintrees" <p.d...@pa...> >To: <web...@li...> >Sent: Monday, September 20, 2004 4:24 PM >Subject: Re: [Web-erp-developers] wegs-erp > > > > >>I dont think it will be that big a problem to get webERP to work with >>Postgres. >>I also think choice is a good thing and at this stage webERP is tied to >>MySQL. >>If the multi-language is finished, if the serial items is finished then I >>could get fired up in a different direction. I don't like half done jobs, >> >> >so > > >>I'll go gettextify another script! >> >>Phil >> >>----- Original Message ----- >>From: "skaill" <sk...@ro...> >>To: <web...@li...> >>Sent: Tuesday, September 21, 2004 2:07 AM >>Subject: Re: [Web-erp-developers] wegs-erp >> >> >> >> >>>Before doing extensive work you may want to check with Phil. With the >>>Multilanguage going on almost all of the files have some sort of changes >>>being done to them. >>> >>>Sounds like the two biggest challenges are: >>> >>>1) Getting to a place of one common DBMS. Personally, I would choose >>> >>> >>mysql >> >> >>>because you get two benefits: You can then offer postgres and mysql >>>versions of your product and the two products would then be much better >>> >>> >>and >> >> >>>easier to integrate. I guess you could move webERP onto postgres but it >>>wouldn't be my first choice. >>> >>>2) Identifying all of the common database tables and seeing how they >>> >>> >vary > > >>>from one product to another. If there are parts where it varies >>>substantially then deciding whether to bring it to one common ground or >>> >>> >>have >> >> >>>some duplication and providing interfaces between. Sort of an automated >>>referential integrity thing but this is probably not that wise. I doubt >>> >>> >>the >> >> >>>common tables will present that great a challenge in combining. >>> >>>Also, it would be good to identify which operations they have in common >>> >>> >to > > >>>figure out the best way to resolve it so one does not negatively affect >>> >>> >>the >> >> >>>other. >>> >>>Just some thinking out loud... >>> >>>One thing is for sure. Combining both products would be a more powerful >>> >>> >>all >> >> >>>round solution ;) Combining teams makes all of us much more powerful as >>>well. >>> >>>Steve >>> >>>----- Original Message ----- >>>From: "Jake Stride" <ns...@us...> >>>To: <web...@li...> >>>Sent: Monday, September 20, 2004 8:01 AM >>>Subject: [Web-erp-developers] wegs-erp >>> >>> >>> >>> >>>>As Dick Stins mentioned in one of hs previous email : >>>> >>>>"The design of these issues should be loosely connected or we should >>>>create one big project (wegs-erp?)." >>>> >>>>Is this something that people would be interested in? >>>> >>>>I for one have little knowledge of ERP, but from a coding and >>>> >>>> >>CRM/project >> >> >>>management side of things, I am fairly well versed and have enough >>> >>> >>knowledge >> >> >>>of ERP to see how the two systems could work together to form a pretty >>>comprehensive business tool. >>> >>> >>>>I am now in a position to start working on integrating EGS/weberp but >>>> >>>> >>>would like to know peoples views on the situation and the best way to >>>proceed. For example the address book for EGS is a core component to the >>>entire system and indeed the CRM functionality runs from it so perhaps >>> >>> >the > > >>>first issue i have is now to over come the integration of the two >>> >>> >address > > >>>books. >>> >>> >>>>Thanks >>>> >>>>Jake >>>> >>>> >>>> >>>> >>>> >>>>------------------------------------------------------- >>>>This SF.Net email is sponsored by: YOU BE THE JUDGE. Be one of 170 >>>>Project Admins to receive an Apple iPod Mini FREE for your judgement >>>> >>>> >on > > >>>>who ports your project to Linux PPC the best. Sponsored by IBM. >>>>Deadline: Sept. 24. Go here: http://sf.net/ppc_contest.php >>>>_______________________________________________ >>>>Web-erp-developers mailing list >>>>Web...@li... >>>>https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/web-erp-developers >>>> >>>> >>> >>>------------------------------------------------------- >>>This SF.Net email is sponsored by: YOU BE THE JUDGE. Be one of 170 >>>Project Admins to receive an Apple iPod Mini FREE for your judgement on >>>who ports your project to Linux PPC the best. Sponsored by IBM. >>>Deadline: Sept. 24. Go here: http://sf.net/ppc_contest.php >>>_______________________________________________ >>>Web-erp-developers mailing list >>>Web...@li... >>>https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/web-erp-developers >>> >>> >>> >> >>------------------------------------------------------- >>This SF.Net email is sponsored by: YOU BE THE JUDGE. Be one of 170 >>Project Admins to receive an Apple iPod Mini FREE for your judgement on >>who ports your project to Linux PPC the best. Sponsored by IBM. >>Deadline: Sept. 24. Go here: http://sf.net/ppc_contest.php >>_______________________________________________ >>Web-erp-developers mailing list >>Web...@li... >>https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/web-erp-developers >> >> > > > >------------------------------------------------------- >This SF.Net email is sponsored by: YOU BE THE JUDGE. Be one of 170 >Project Admins to receive an Apple iPod Mini FREE for your judgement on >who ports your project to Linux PPC the best. Sponsored by IBM. >Deadline: Sept. 24. Go here: http://sf.net/ppc_contest.php >_______________________________________________ >Web-erp-developers mailing list >Web...@li... >https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/web-erp-developers > > |