From: skaill <sk...@ro...> - 2004-08-16 20:40:13
|
Sounds good. I'll be there. To do the majority of the work we just need to find who all is involved, split the pages up between us and decide whether to use gettext() or an alias like _(). From there each of us just finds all the strings in their pages and puts in the function call. Steve ----- Original Message ----- From: "Daintrees" <p.d...@pa...> To: <web...@li...> Sent: Monday, August 16, 2004 4:26 PM Subject: Re: [Web-erp-developers] Translations > Luca is still away basking in the med sunshine but he preferred the db > approach. Luca was keen to get stuck in on his return and we should wait for > his input. However, I would like us to go ahead with the gettext approach as > Hani who has done this already advises. There is quite a swag of resources > around gettext and it appears almost a defacto standard. > > I think it is well known that my objection is to compromising the > readability of the code. Using gettext appears not to damage this too badly. > It might be an idea if those developers who are keen to be a part of this > effort put their hands up and once the approach is clear then divide and > conquor > > Phil > > > > ------------------------------------------------------- > SF.Net email is sponsored by Shop4tech.com-Lowest price on Blank Media > 100pk Sonic DVD-R 4x for only $29 -100pk Sonic DVD+R for only $33 > Save 50% off Retail on Ink & Toner - Free Shipping and Free Gift. > http://www.shop4tech.com/z/Inkjet_Cartridges/9_108_r285 > _______________________________________________ > Web-erp-developers mailing list > Web...@li... > https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/web-erp-developers |