From: Daintrees <p.d...@pa...> - 2004-08-11 01:00:52
|
Maybe we could look at this from another angle. What about this .... The existing manual converted to html - I will do this tonight. Steve cut an paste the html into appropriate help pages. Perhaps we classify paged as belonging to certain modules and perhaps an = order for the help page in the manual, then all future manuals could be = created by a query to return the help stored in the db - slam dunk into = a text/html file one big manual all linked based on our data in the db = about pages and where they belong. The help in the db is thus the one = source of information about webERP. Any thoughts guys? Phil ----- Original Message -----=20 From: Danie Brink=20 To: Phil Daintree=20 Sent: Wednesday, August 11, 2004 12:03 PM Subject: Re: [Web-erp-developers] Help Hi Steve No I'm suggesting we write it in some combination of XML/ Wiki markup = that can easily be converted to either HTML or Latex or whatever just = using a tool. For instance I use a simple php wiki on my website which = saves me from checking all the HTML but there should be no difficulty in = taking those wiki pages (manual) and converting them to latex to create = a professional looking manual, also it would then be fairly easy to = maintain the manual in plain text. see phpWiki - = http://sourceforge.net/projects/phpwiki/ I am fairly sure that it would = require less work to convert the manual to plain text and to maintain it = in that form. To generate Latex or should be fairly simple it would just = require the wiki to generate Latex rather than html and passing that = through a Latex parser using popen with say pdflatex would generate a = pdf document etc. An additional benefit is that the client/customer/user could add his = own noted to the help as he require. These could then be passed back to = us in the form of a contribution, and as it is text even the = client/customer/user will be able to work on the betterment of the = manuals without having to know html. Kind Regards Danie Brink On Tue, 2004-08-10 at 22:11, skaill wrote:=20 =EF=BB=BF=20 I think I'm a bit confused. I think it will be clearer when I get = the example. It sounds like you're suggesting the manual would be best = written in Latex (whatever that is) and then Latex will be easily able = to parse the manual into those sections. Am I understanding? =20 Steve=20 ----- Original Message -----=20 From: Danie Brink To: Phil Daintree Sent: Tuesday, August 10, 2004 1:01 PM Subject: Re: [Web-erp-developers] Help Hi Steve , I have gained some experience recently with Latex writing my = reporting framework, and I know already that it is hard to do and keep = maintained, however, there is converters which will convert latex to = HTML, pdf and other formats as well. It will also look a lot more = professional. I have included an example of what Latex can do in one of my = reports generated through my report system in PDF format.=20 I am prepared to convert the manual as I have to do it any way. I = could do it in the next few days if you want me to. I will just have to = put the tax system on hold for those few days. Just some thoughts.=20 P.S. Latex Parsers/Converters is also available for both windows = and UNIX. Kind Regards Danie Brink On Tue, 2004-08-10 at 14:50, skaill wrote:=20 I've been thinking about the best way to not only get the manual = into the online help for various scripts but also how to best maintain = it in the future as the system evolves. I'm thinking the best way would = be to convert the manual to html since the online help needs to be = formatted in html also. =20 Unfortunately if I try saving the manual to html in Word the = document saved ends up xml plus it has all kinds of css. None of this = is needed. From what I see only fonts (size mainly), bold, underline, = returns, lists and tables are needed for the entire manual so a help css = is overkill. =20 Now, I can sit and copy/format those 70 pages of manual into = html manually and don't mind doing it but at the end I need to know that = we can stick to the html version and not the .doc version of the manual. = Keeping up two versions as well as the online will be too much and the = html version, I believe, is the one that makes sense. =20 Once I have the entire manual manually converted to html then = copy and pasting to the online help will be simple. It will continue to = be much simpler in the future as well when the manual ends up being = modified. =20 Note that going with html means we can also readily supply = another link called something like Online Manual that will display the = entire manual. =20 Any comments/suggestions from anyone? Phil, please let me know = if this is a good way to proceed. =20 Steve |