From: Daintrees <p.d...@pa...> - 2004-07-23 23:39:27
|
> > If I may comment on the need for alternate interfaces I believe there are > many reasons. You may want to change the interface to be better for certain > devices such as the wireless group. Possibly for handicapped, especially > blind. Multilanguage we've discussed. Maybe just because people want to > customize the interface for the particular work they do. Sometimes a > company may want ONLY certain options appearing for the shipper or for the > accounts receivable clerk. Yes, security restricts then but options plus > on-the-fly context based interface changing can be more effective is several > situations. I think it is relatively easy to create these specialised screens with a little cut and paste - I imagine it is something like this that Chris has done to get his wireless system going. > > Having said this, it is still most important to be able to rely on the > system and be able for as many people to easily code within it without > mistakes and confusion. Congratulations to Phil and the group here for > achieving and retaining that primary goal. While I believe in 3 tier > (database, business rules and front end) where it makes good sense, there > are times when maybe it is good theory or a compromise between both > approaches is the best alternative. Sometimes I have found also that 3 > tiered using higher technology inherently ends up slowing the code down and > overcomplicates the contextual reading/understanding of it. > > Steve Wow ... I have never had anyone actually agree with my controversial thoughts on this. Thanks for your support Steve. Phil |