From: skaill <sk...@ro...> - 2004-07-23 16:16:53
|
In regard to the GPL, I think I was reading about a newer and better licensing that seems like a better encouragement for all to get involved including business yet keeps the necessary ingredients of the GPL. Have you considered that license instead, Phil? I don't mean to be pushy, just asking. Steve ----- Original Message ----- From: "Phil Daintree" <ph...@du...> To: "Web ERP Developers" <Web...@li...> Sent: Thursday, July 22, 2004 8:36 PM Subject: [Web-erp-developers] Lisencing > In reponse to Steve's question: > > >Having said that, if we run into a customer who has a multilanguage > requirement what are the concerns >under the licencing of us customizing > webERP as I've discussed for them? To my understanding that is >ok, right? > Should I be asking this type of question here or in a different forum?! > >Having said that, if we run into a customer who has a multilanguage > requirement what are the concerns >under the licencing of us customizing > webERP as I've discussed for them? To my understanding that is >ok, right? > Should I be asking this type of question here or in a different forum?! > > > I am pretty relaxed about all this stuff. I would prefer that any > modifications made were at least offered back to the project for the benefit > of any others. However, I am aware of folks who just rip it off make cool > modifications which they do not then include as open source and feel no > prick of conscience in doing so. Clearly my ability to police the GPL is > pretty limited - I am much more interested in developing new functionality > thats why I plead and beg for help in doing so. In terms of multi-language > stuff which might compromise stability I didn't have the stomach for it when > Sherif and Hani wanted to have a go that's why Open Accounting was started - > it looks like they are floundering with this project and it makes me > particularly nervous in going down that track too. I think if anyone could > have pulled it off those guys could and my preference would be for resources > and help re language support to go to Open-Accounting rather than > re-inventing the wheel with web-erp. > > I am not sure where they are up to with their project I think they may have > re-written large chunks of web-erp in a more elegant way (from the computer > scientist/purist perspective) - but I expect that it will not be so easy for > a business person to get their head into with classes and abstraction at > every turn. This is another aim of web-erp that I expect will be compromised > by Open-Accounting. The low bandwidth requirement aim has also been > steamrollered. However, I am still hoping it will re-surface as a good > multi-language alternative. > > > Phil > > > > ------------------------------------------------------- > This SF.Net email is sponsored by BEA Weblogic Workshop > FREE Java Enterprise J2EE developer tools! > Get your free copy of BEA WebLogic Workshop 8.1 today. > http://ads.osdn.com/?ad_id=4721&alloc_id=10040&op=click > _______________________________________________ > Web-erp-developers mailing list > Web...@li... > https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/web-erp-developers |