Menu
▾
▴
Re: [WebERP-developers] New version
|
From: Phil D. <ph...@lo...> - 2015-01-22 05:34:24
|
Well on that basis, if it is easy to bring it in - would be great! Phil Phil Daintree Logic Works Ltd - +64 (0)275 567890 http://www.logicworks.co.nz On 22/01/15 17:50, Andrew Galuski wrote: > No need for a parameter and the code added didn't require using the > new functionality. Anybody with security to invoice can skip picking > and shipping and invoice directly. If picking already done somebody > with permissions to invoice can skip 'shipping' step as well. However > if you wish to use it you can send picklists to the warehouse and > they can pick and print packing slips (including lot/serial details). > Shipping is done by warehouse and invoice is just a confirmation / 1 > click. Has been used now for multiple months in a multi-user > environment. Even for credit/rebills accounting goes through > pick/pack/ship process because they like it and the paperwork. > People used too existing process just continue to use it. > > > Sent from my BlackBerry 10 smartphone on the Verizon Wireless 4G LTE > network. > *From: *Phil Daintree > *Sent: *Wednesday, January 21, 2015 10:26 PM > *To: *webERP Developers > *Reply To: *webERP Developers > *Subject: *Re: [WebERP-developers] New version > > > The feature that you think is good that we didn't include was the > separation of picking and confirming/invoicing as I recall which added > another layer into the workflow which couldn't be circumvented. If it > could be circumvented to retain the existing workflow using a > parameter then I'd be keen ... I just didn't want to add functionality > that people who are used to webERP would be forced to use. > > Phil > > Phil Daintree > Logic Works Ltd - +64 (0)275 567890 > http://www.logicworks.co.nz > On 22/01/15 08:20, Andrew Galuski wrote: >> >> Hello Rafael, >> >> Yes - I try to incorporate as ,much as I can into the main trunk. >> Very rarely I see a specific business need that I keep to myself and >> 1 major change wasn’t quite accepted in the trunk Leven though I >> think it is a good feature. So that one will be more work for me to >> incorporate >> >> Best Regards, >> >> Andrew Galuski >> >> ResMart LLC. >> >> 817.615.2038 (Office) >> >> 817.821.0544 (Cell) >> >> www.resmart.com <http://www.resmart.com> >> >> resmart_logo >> >> *From:*Rafael Chacón [mailto:raf...@gm...] >> *Sent:* Wednesday, January 21, 2015 1:01 PM >> *To:* webERP Developers >> *Subject:* Re: [WebERP-developers] New version >> >> Hi Andrew, >> >> Yes, I understand. For me, always a new version involves an effort to >> compare new version with customised versions. >> At the beginning, as a newbie, I made the mistake of doing several >> customised versions. Now, I prefer to not do customized versions (the >> update is a headache). Instead, I prefer to include new features in >> the webERP main version if it make sense. I am trying to move those >> customisation to main code. Lucky, except forms, I eliminated the >> other customisations >> >> For modifications done, is it possible to incorporate them as new >> features or options? Maybe we can join efforts in that way. >> >> Best regards, Rafael. >> >> 2015-01-21 12:47 GMT-06:00 Rafael Chacón >> <raf...@gm... <mailto:raf...@gm...>>: >> >> Hi, >> >> IMHO, the arguments for a new version are: >> >> 1. As a Software Libre (free and open source software) >> >> A new version is a way to share the changes made to the shared code. >> A new version fixes bugs and adds new features, and makes them >> available to everyone (not just developers and testers). >> I suggest twice a year, as other Software Libre does (Ubuntu, >> LibreOffice, etc.). It could be in May and November of each year. In >> this way, we can schedule advertising and do intensive testing in >> April and October. >> >> 2. A specific new release after 4.11.5 >> >> + The release is 4.11.5 came out between some modifications and its >> bug fixes. So if someone uses 4.11.5, he will have a version with >> bugs that are already fixed. >> + Since version 4.11.5 to today, there have been many changes. These >> charges are important. E.g.: db-function, Z_UpdateItemCosts.php, >> CustomerBalancesMovement.php, new Quality Module, translation >> scripts, etc. Some of them involves databases changes. >> >> I suggest a new version to not comprise an installation with bugs >> already fixed. It could be 4.11.5.b (with only the bug fixes added) >> or a new release 4.12. >> >> Best regads, Rafael. >> >> 2015-01-21 12:06 GMT-06:00 Phil Daintree <ph...@lo... >> <mailto:ph...@lo...>>: >> >> Re: [WebERP-developers] New version.eml >> >> Subject: >> >> Re: [WebERP-developers] New version >> >> From: >> >> Tim Schofield <tim...@gm...> >> <mailto:tim...@gm...> >> >> Date: >> >> 22/01/15 03:46 >> >> To: >> >> webERP Developers <web...@li...> >> <mailto:web...@li...> >> >> Mostly just a warning. DB_query() is defined as function DB_query >> >> ($SQL, $ErrorMessage='', $DebugMessage= '', $Transaction=false, >> >> $TrapErrors=true) so if you did a call such as DB_query($SQL, $db) it >> >> will assume the error message to be the value of $db so you will just >> >> get a wrong type warning. >> >> >> >> However if you did a call such as DB_query ($SQL, $db, 'Error >> >> Message', 'Debug Message', false, true); you will get an error as >> >> there are an incorrect number of parameters used. >> >> >> >> Either way you should get rid of all $db except those in the >> >> ConnectDB_*.inc files >> >> >> >> Thanks >> >> Tim >> >> >> >> On 21 January 2015 at 14:03, Andrew Galuski<aga...@re...> <mailto:aga...@re...> wrote: >> >> IOn 22/01/15 03:03, Andrew Galuski wrote: >> >> It will be a large effort on my part (Especially identifying all my modifications I have that may not be in the main trunk (Like the picking, packing, shipping functionality that is separate from Invoicing) >> >> Quick question, If I still call DB_Query() in code with the $db parameter and the include file doesn't expect it will I get a hard error or a warning? >> >> >> >> Best Regards, >> >> Andrew Galuski >> >> >> >> >> >> -----Original Message----- >> >> From: Phil Daintree [mailto:ph...@lo...] >> >> Sent: Tuesday, January 20, 2015 11:38 PM >> >> To: webERP Developers >> >> Subject: [WebERP-developers] New version >> >> >> >> Rafael suggested we go for a new version recently. >> >> We last released in October - I thought it was more recent than that. >> >> There are a few bug fixes in there and a whole load of work I did to change the DB_query() calls to exclude the global $db in them. Would be interested to know what others think about another release now? >> >> >> >> -- >> >> Phil >> >> >> >> Phil Daintree >> >> Logic Works Ltd - +64 (0)275 567890 >> >> http://www.logicworks.co.nz >> >> >> >> >> >> ------------------------------------------------------------------------------ >> >> New Year. New Location. New Benefits. New Data Center in Ashburn, VA. >> >> GigeNET is offering a free month of service with a new server in Ashburn. >> >> Choose from 2 high performing configs, both with 100TB of bandwidth. >> >> Higher redundancy.Lower latency.Increased capacity.Completely compliant. >> >> http://p.sf.net/sfu/gigenet >> >> _______________________________________________ >> >> Web-erp-developers mailing list >> >> Web...@li... <mailto:Web...@li...> >> >> https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/web-erp-developers >> >> >> >> ------------------------------------------------------------------------------ >> >> New Year. New Location. New Benefits. New Data Center in Ashburn, VA. >> >> GigeNET is offering a free month of service with a new server in Ashburn. >> >> Choose from 2 high performing configs, both with 100TB of bandwidth. >> >> Higher redundancy.Lower latency.Increased capacity.Completely compliant. >> >> http://p.sf.net/sfu/gigenet >> >> _______________________________________________ >> >> Web-erp-developers mailing list >> >> Web...@li... <mailto:Web...@li...> >> >> https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/web-erp-developers >> >> >> >> >> ------------------------------------------------------------------------------ >> New Year. New Location. New Benefits. New Data Center in Ashburn, VA. >> GigeNET is offering a free month of service with a new server in >> Ashburn. >> Choose from 2 high performing configs, both with 100TB of bandwidth. >> Higher redundancy.Lower latency.Increased capacity.Completely >> compliant. >> http://p.sf.net/sfu/gigenet >> _______________________________________________ >> Web-erp-developers mailing list >> Web...@li... >> <mailto:Web...@li...> >> https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/web-erp-developers >> >> >> >> ------------------------------------------------------------------------------ >> New Year. New Location. New Benefits. New Data Center in Ashburn, VA. >> GigeNET is offering a free month of service with a new server in Ashburn. >> Choose from 2 high performing configs, both with 100TB of bandwidth. >> Higher redundancy.Lower latency.Increased capacity.Completely compliant. >> http://p.sf.net/sfu/gigenet >> >> >> _______________________________________________ >> Web-erp-developers mailing list >> Web...@li... >> https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/web-erp-developers > > > > ------------------------------------------------------------------------------ > New Year. New Location. New Benefits. New Data Center in Ashburn, VA. > GigeNET is offering a free month of service with a new server in Ashburn. > Choose from 2 high performing configs, both with 100TB of bandwidth. > Higher redundancy.Lower latency.Increased capacity.Completely compliant. > http://p.sf.net/sfu/gigenet > > > _______________________________________________ > Web-erp-developers mailing list > Web...@li... > https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/web-erp-developers |
