From: Phil D. <ph...@lo...> - 2014-11-11 08:25:26
|
I am not sure I understand why? The PO is a document for the supplier. If the supplier code exists then it should be printed as the most accurate description to the supplier of what it is we are wanting to purchase. Putting our item code in the description could mean something different to the supplier so - following some off-list discussion - I removed this - concurring with the logic that the PO is a supplier facing document and we have a record of what item it relates to for us from any webERP PO inquiry. If you wish to make it configurable ok - but I think it is better NOT to have it on a PO if there is a supplier code which more accurately describes the item to the supplier. Phil Phil Daintree Logic Works Ltd - +64 (0)275 567890 http://www.logicworks.co.nz On 11/11/14 20:26, Pak Ricard wrote: > Hi Phil: > > SOmeone from my team complained that when printing the PDF for PO, the > stockid is not shown anymore (if there's any supplier code for this > item). Seems like you introduced this change in commit 6758, but we > think it is useful to always have the webERP stockid in printed PO > > It's useful n reception checking time of PO's as company employees are > normally used to stockid, not supplier id's. > > Could we reverse this or find a way to always show the stockid? What > about if first column is always stockid and "Item Description" column > is supplierid + description? > > Regards, > Ricard > > > ------------------------------------------------------------------------------ > Comprehensive Server Monitoring with Site24x7. > Monitor 10 servers for $9/Month. > Get alerted through email, SMS, voice calls or mobile push notifications. > Take corrective actions from your mobile device. > http://pubads.g.doubleclick.net/gampad/clk?id=154624111&iu=/4140/ostg.clktrk > > > _______________________________________________ > Web-erp-developers mailing list > Web...@li... > https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/web-erp-developers |