From: ExsonQu <hex...@gm...> - 2014-09-14 11:20:22
|
Hi, Rafael, Sorry for make the revision not to discuss with you. The reason why I reverse it back is that I've found error notices that some parameters are fewer then required for the printf(). And at the mean time I think some new TD definitions make it hard to understand the business meaning of those codes although the code become short. I should have a discussion with the author who have revised before I revert it. I apologize for not having a discussion. Best regards! Exson -- View this message in context: http://weberp-accounting.1478800.n4.nabble.com/CustomerInquiry-php-W3C-html-code-tp4657643p4657646.html Sent from the web-ERP-developers mailing list archive at Nabble.com. |