From: Phil D. <ph...@lo...> - 2014-09-11 08:40:15
|
yep great idea Phil Phil Daintree Logic Works Ltd - +64 (0)275 567890 http://www.logicworks.co.nz On 11/09/14 19:03, Pak Ricard wrote: > Hi Phil: > > Now it's crystal clear. Then, does it make sense to add a flag to > locations table, to mark locations to be used / hiden for WO purposes? > > As I see it, not all locations are meant to be production locations, > so it seems logicalk to show only those locations available for WO > purposes. > > Does it sound OK? If so, I'm happy to code it. > > Regards, > Ricard > > 2014-09-11 14:51 GMT+08:00 Phil Daintree <ph...@lo... > <mailto:ph...@lo...>>: > > Hi Ricard, > > Well work centres are meant to refer to the cells within locations > where the work is done ... in a jewellery manufacturing business > there might be a stone polishing work centre, a soldering work > centre, turning, annealing and such like. Each work centre might > have different overhead rate applicable with differing machine > content etc and this was the intention with work centres. The BOMs > are defined by work centre so the materials can be specified by > work centre. They are quite different to locations (AKA inventory > locations/factories or warehouses). There can be a different BOM > at a different location/factory that in turn may well refer to > different work centres. > > Phil > > Phil Daintree > Logic Works Ltd - +64 (0)275 567890 > http://www.logicworks.co.nz > > On 11/09/14 16:01, Pak Ricard wrote: >> Hi all: >> >> If I understood it properly, we do have a table called >> workcentres which is supposed to contain the locations where WO >> can be produced. >> If so, why do we use locations table to select the Factory >> Location when entering a WO? >> >> locations table can include locations used as ready to sell >> warehouses, shops, recycle bins, component warehouses, etc >> besides "factory locations". >> >> In WorkOrderEntry (and similar scripts), should we restrict the >> drop down locations list to locations being set up as work centers? >> >> Regards, >> Ricard >> >> >> ------------------------------------------------------------------------------ >> Want excitement? >> Manually upgrade your production database. >> When you want reliability, choose Perforce >> Perforce version control. Predictably reliable. >> http://pubads.g.doubleclick.net/gampad/clk?id=157508191&iu=/4140/ostg.clktrk >> >> >> _______________________________________________ >> Web-erp-developers mailing list >> Web...@li... <mailto:Web...@li...> >> https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/web-erp-developers > > > ------------------------------------------------------------------------------ > Want excitement? > Manually upgrade your production database. > When you want reliability, choose Perforce > Perforce version control. Predictably reliable. > http://pubads.g.doubleclick.net/gampad/clk?id=157508191&iu=/4140/ostg.clktrk > _______________________________________________ > Web-erp-developers mailing list > Web...@li... > <mailto:Web...@li...> > https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/web-erp-developers > > > > > ------------------------------------------------------------------------------ > Want excitement? > Manually upgrade your production database. > When you want reliability, choose Perforce > Perforce version control. Predictably reliable. > http://pubads.g.doubleclick.net/gampad/clk?id=157508191&iu=/4140/ostg.clktrk > > > _______________________________________________ > Web-erp-developers mailing list > Web...@li... > https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/web-erp-developers |