Re: [WebERP-developers] TableRows()

[ExsonQu <hex...@gm...>]

*Dear all,*

           I agree with Phil that we should pay more attention to those old
codes' (or called redundant?). The abstraction to avoid have at least some
merit that:
           1. If there is a bug in the code, it's very clear. 
           2. I believe in most of time, it's fast. 
           3. If we change these tested stable codes, it becomes green code.
It introduce new risk to our users.
           4. And most of the time, it sacrifice the readability. Because we
have to understand a new definition which seems intuitive to the author but
others have to study it. 

          I think most of the time, I don't like the code style of webERP
because I cannot code fast. Its a hand-make style and not economic. But the
style make those codes reliable and robust and fast. And it's very easy to
modify what you need to do is just to search those strings you need. 

          So lets focus on adding new features instead of those existed
codes or the coding convention, IMHO.

          Best regards!

          Exson

          
          

            

          



--
View this message in context: http://weberp-accounting.1478800.n4.nabble.com/TableRows-tp4657615p4657634.html
Sent from the web-ERP-developers mailing list archive at Nabble.com.