From: Phil D. <ph...@lo...> - 2014-04-03 08:08:45
|
Hi Exson, Thanks for your great efforts to make webERP better. That's an interesting idea - perhaps for 1 it needs to be by item - so perhaps they are ok to provide widget X but not widget Y. 2. Yes if we can work out a URL to initiate IM then would be good 3. Not quite so clear on this one. I think the salesman logic got a bit messy - not clear on how you see this evolving. Did the warehouse management development work ever get completed? Best regards Phil Phil Daintree Logic Works Ltd - +64 (0)275 567890 http://www.logicworks.co.nz On 03/04/14 14:26, ExsonQu wrote: > *Dear all,* > > Thank you for your great efforts to webERP. > > I'd like to know if it need to develop following features or we > have work around for it: > > 1. Vendor status management. Currently, we have customers status > management such as watch, liquid, good etc. But we have no corresponding > feature with suppliers. I think it's also a need feature to record suppliers > status such as assessment, qualified, non-conformance. We can only issue PO > to qualified vendors. > > 2. IM is very popular even between businesses today, shall we > add a IM contact address for customer branches? > > 3. We have some control about sales people login now. But > sometime, roles such as sales group leaders have to view whole group's > customer data, is there any workaround or we just have to develop some new > feature. > > Any comments are welcome! > > Thanks and best regards! > > Exson > > > > -- > View this message in context: http://weberp-accounting.1478800.n4.nabble.com/Other-feature-to-develop-tp4657319.html > Sent from the web-ERP-developers mailing list archive at Nabble.com. > > ------------------------------------------------------------------------------ > _______________________________________________ > Web-erp-developers mailing list > Web...@li... > https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/web-erp-developers > |