From: Phil D. <ph...@lo...> - 2013-11-27 06:40:19
|
It is not necessary to modify the transaction type in the gltrans table. Can you point me to where the manual said the integration should be off when taking on GL balances? I can see where it says this in relation to setting up debtors and creditors balances i.e the open items in the sub-ledgers. Which listings are you not able to see the balances ... script names ideally please. Maybe this is where the problem lies - assuming the trial balance shows the balances correctly! Phil Phil Daintree Logic Works Ltd - +64 (0)275 567890 http://www.logicworks.co.nz On 27/11/13 15:23, iced lava wrote: > Provisos and issue remaining: > > 1. The opening balance transaction in the example with GL trans should > occur with GL turned off (if instructions in manual are correct) > > 2. The behaviour cannot be applied generally to transactions through > General Ledger unless the these transactions are displayed, such as > bank fees, in the bank reconcilliation listings. They do not display > when type is set to 0 (general journal) in the gltrans table and so > fix should be determined for the reconcilliation functions. > > Comments appreciated. > > Thanks, > > > > On Wed, Nov 27, 2013 at 12:44 PM, iced lava <ice...@gm... > <mailto:ice...@gm...>> wrote: > > As an example: > I note that if I enter the bank balances at 30 June with GL on, I > can change the Type of transaction in the gltrans table to 0 > (general journal). Appropriate [next] incremented general journal > numbers a can provided to these transactions by editing as well > [and systype incremented accordingly and chart detail also adjusted]. > > If this is done then the year closing journals appear as required > in the journal listings, on the trial balance and the bank > listings and reports also seem correct (transactions are left > untouched in banktrans table). > > > This is as expected for the entry made through General Ledger bank > receipts. > > > Is this a bug? > Should this behaviour also happen for other bank receipts and > payments made through General Ledger option? I would think so. > > I can fix if required. > > Thanks. > > > > > On Wed, Nov 27, 2013 at 12:04 PM, iced lava <ice...@gm... > <mailto:ice...@gm...>> wrote: > > Could I have confirmation on what should happen when bank > account balances are entered in for end of year closing > balances eg at 30 June. > > Here is the current behaviour I see in latest webERP. Note > that usually according to documentation year end balances > should be done with GL integration off. > > 1. With GL integration turned off, the bank balances are taken > on at 30 June by entering a receipt (General Ledger - Bank > account receipt entry). > > * This transaction only appears as a single entry in the > banktrans table - nowhere else > * there is no corresponding balancing transaction - it would > have to be made manually > * as such the bank account balances do not appear in any 30 > June trial balance > * a listing of 30 June journal entries does not show any 30 > June entries for any bank accounts GL accounts > * trial balance as a consequence does not have any entries > for these bank transactions > > > 2. With the GL integration turned on - if the bank balances > are taken on at 30 June by entering a receipt (General Ledger > - Bank account receipt entry) > > * The transaction appears as an entry in the banktrans table > * there is a corresponding transaction in the gltrans table > and the balancing transaction(s) > * the chartdetails table has entries for these transactions > * trial balance shows an entry for these bank accounts > * the listing of 30 June journal entries does not show > anything for the bank accounts > * the type in the gltrans table is type 12 - bank > transaction, not 0 for general journal > > > This is causing confusing with customer. > > The behaviour I thought would happen is that any bank > transactions entered through the General Ledger - Bank account > [receipt/payment] should in fact have entries in gltrans table > and subsequent entries in the chart details. They then should > appear in journal reports. > > This would be in contrast to payments/receipts made via the > Payments and Receipts menus for debtors and creditors. > > However, for bank fees and such which must be entered through > General Ledger payment (not a creditor), this poses a problem > as the amounts will show in bank account transaction > listings/reconcilliations - as they should. Howevrer they will > never show as a general journal or reports as such (they are > trans 12 not 0). > > Thanks in advance for any advice. > > Cheers, > > > > > > > > > > ------------------------------------------------------------------------------ > Rapidly troubleshoot problems before they affect your business. Most IT > organizations don't have a clear picture of how application performance > affects their revenue. With AppDynamics, you get 100% visibility into your > Java,.NET, & PHP application. Start your 15-day FREE TRIAL of AppDynamics Pro! > http://pubads.g.doubleclick.net/gampad/clk?id=84349351&iu=/4140/ostg.clktrk > > > _______________________________________________ > Web-erp-developers mailing list > Web...@li... > https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/web-erp-developers |