Re: [WebERP-developers] Intention to roll up new version and future plans

[webERP D. <web...@li...>]

By the time you have all the plugins required - this does increase the 
burden considerably and I am rethinking this whole idea in view of good 
comments from Exson and Kalmer. I am not sure it is worth it with jQuery 
- I know we have been around this a few times now - I will research html5...

Phil

Phil Daintree
Logic Works Ltd - +64 (0)275 567890
http://www.logicworks.co.nz
skype:daintree


On 05/07/13 20:30, webERP Developers wrote:
> the problem is that one cannot put jquery plugins into single scripts if you
> have not loaded them in the header.
>
> But also, one does not want to load all js for all scripts, if the plugins
> are not needed there.
>
> .
> Therefore, it is good if an ndividual script can ask weberp to add something
> to the header, for example, as web2project does. One could copy their
> functionality.
> .
> Then I can use jquery for manufacturing and BOM, whereas someone else who
> does concentrate on something else can use an individual js approach.
>
> And each script would only load that js that is actually needed.
>
> Klaus
>
>
>
> --
> View this message in context: http://weberp-accounting.1478800.n4.nabble.com/Intention-to-roll-up-new-version-and-future-plans-tp4656547p4656558.html
> Sent from the web-ERP-developers mailing list archive at Nabble.com.
>
> ------------------------------------------------------------------------------
> This SF.net email is sponsored by Windows:
>
> Build for Windows Store.
>
> http://p.sf.net/sfu/windows-dev2dev
> _______________________________________________
> Web-erp-developers mailing list
> Web...@li...
> https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/web-erp-developers
>