All the editting I have done is to a checked out copy of the
version in the CVS tree. After I am done editting, I do a
commit. After that finishes, I do a cvs checkout into
the area for the htdocs for the web server.
So, all the content changes are in the CVS tree.
If you would like to refer to this comment somewhere else in this project, copy and paste the following link:
Logged In: YES
user_id=44912
What really needs to be done is a complete overhaul off the
web documentation to make it suck less.
Step one is complete -- all the html is cleaned up, spell
checked
and tidy'd. Style sheets are in use. Content-Encoding meta
tags are inserted.
I'll give a little more thought to how the data ought to be
presented
and then whack on the html more.
Logged In: YES
user_id=2221
Are you working on the copy in CVS, or directly on the server (which I think is a cvs export)?
Logged In: YES
user_id=44912
All the editting I have done is to a checked out copy of the
version in the CVS tree. After I am done editting, I do a
commit. After that finishes, I do a cvs checkout into
the area for the htdocs for the web server.
So, all the content changes are in the CVS tree.
Logged In: YES
user_id=12814
So is this ever going to be done to the docs? Kurt, do
you agree that it should be?
We should resolve this so we can close the bug...