From: Matt L. <mat...@gm...> - 2007-05-23 20:45:34
|
I've taken a stab at removing all Qt3 compatibility code from the new Qt4 port. This has been tested in Linux but not in Windows. Most things seem to work (at least as well as they used to). It still needs a little work to make it good as the other vgui toolkits. Let me know if there are any issues. --Matt Leotta On 5/18/07, Christoph John <cj...@in...> wrote: > Hello Matt, > Thanks for testing the QT4 implementation. When I addded qt4 support to > the makefile I was not aware of the DESIRED_QT_VERSION option. Currently > I do not have the time to change the makefile. But as soon as I get > some, I will change it. > Concerning your question to a native qt4 port. It would be nice to have > one, but I do not have the time and need for a native port. The > decission to use the qt3 support layer was made because I needed a fast > hack to get vxl running with my app. > If you like to add a native qt4 implementation it would be great. > A last word to gtk2. I have not tried to compile with it, because I do > not work with gtk2. I only tested vgui with qt as single option and the > qt commercial packages 4.2.2 and 4.2.3 as well as with qt4 and mfc > options enabled together. > > And a realy last note to qt4 and Visual Studio 2005 compiler, which is > not directly related to the port. Qt4 cannot be compiled with Visual > Studio SP1, be aware of it when testing. SP1 has a new feature called > compiler bug which leads to errors in template interpretation. Hotfix > "VS80sp1-KB930859-X86-ENU.exe" is needed to resolve this issue. > > Cheers > Christoph > |