From: <Pet...@es...> - 2002-01-24 16:22:22
|
> ... the .txx files should not be added to the source lists. That's a problem. Msdev users would like to see every source file, be it Source, Header or Resource, somewhere in the list of files. Peter. |
From: Amitha P. <pe...@cs...> - 2002-01-24 16:29:24
|
> > ... the .txx files should not be added to the source lists. > > That's a problem. Msdev users would like to see every source file, > be it Source, Header or Resource, somewhere in the list of files. I think what Bill meant is that .txx will not be processed by the Makefile, just as .h files aren't processed by the Makefile. (I changed .txx to be a "header" file instead of a "source" file, since .txx files aren't directly compiled.) So, I think it should be safe to have .cxx, .h and .txx files in the SOURCE_FILES() command, and have all the platforms do the right thing. Amitha. |
From: William A. H. <bil...@ny...> - 2002-01-24 18:06:03
|
I did not know that Amitha did that. In that case it should work. -Bill At 11:29 AM 1/24/2002 -0500, Amitha Perera wrote: >> > ... the .txx files should not be added to the source lists. >> >> That's a problem. Msdev users would like to see every source file, >> be it Source, Header or Resource, somewhere in the list of files. > >I think what Bill meant is that .txx will not be processed by the >Makefile, just as .h files aren't processed by the Makefile. (I >changed .txx to be a "header" file instead of a "source" file, since >.txx files aren't directly compiled.) > >So, I think it should be safe to have .cxx, .h and .txx files in the >SOURCE_FILES() command, and have all the platforms do the right thing. > >Amitha. > >_______________________________________________ >Vxl-maintainers mailing list >Vxl...@li... >https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/vxl-maintainers |