#58 Well-timed SigHUP can knock debian client into spammy loop

[Bishop]

CC of bug as reported separately:

[1] http://osdir.com/ml/fedora-package-announce/2016-04/msg00410.html

[2] https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1319858
[3] https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1319859
[4] https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1319860
[5] https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1319861

They all stem from this report:
[6] https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=818489

which also is repeated here:
[7] http://seclists.org/oss-sec/2016/q2/157

but rejected here:
[8] http://seclists.org/oss-sec/2016/q2/173

[Bishop]

When it comes down to it, and since I worry the Debian package has a few patches that aren't reflected/sent upstream, I'm not sure it's not just affecting them.

I'm gonna push this into a pending state as it's waiting on the rest of the report.