|
From: Doug M. <mc...@ia...> - 2009-10-18 14:59:29
|
What is required to fix this bug? Is this the only thing that is really out there that has to be dealt with for 3.0? Doug On Oct 18, 2009, at 8:23 AM, Patrick Hartling wrote: > I've been meaning to make a 3.0 release branch and back out the change > that broke analog devices in a cluster configuration. It is clear that > no one has time to work on the proxy refactoring that would > (potentially) fix the bug. It will probably have to wait for the next > release (3.2, 4.0, whichever is appropriate). > > -Patrick > > > -- > Patrick L. Hartling > Senior Software Engineer > Priority 5 > > On Oct 17, 2009, at 9:12 PM, Doug McCorkle <mc...@ia...> wrote: > >> Hello, >> >> I am interested to know what the schedule is or what is left to be >> done before VR Juggler 3.0 can be released? I know we are working >> on a >> few things that we hope to contribute over the next few months but we >> would like to know what has to be done before 3.0 can be released. >> Thanks. >> >> Doug |