You can subscribe to this list here.
2000 |
Jan
|
Feb
|
Mar
|
Apr
|
May
|
Jun
(4) |
Jul
(1) |
Aug
|
Sep
(15) |
Oct
(32) |
Nov
(35) |
Dec
(48) |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
2001 |
Jan
(46) |
Feb
(22) |
Mar
(65) |
Apr
(49) |
May
(22) |
Jun
(29) |
Jul
(51) |
Aug
(34) |
Sep
(32) |
Oct
(46) |
Nov
(30) |
Dec
(32) |
2002 |
Jan
(48) |
Feb
(4) |
Mar
(20) |
Apr
(28) |
May
(13) |
Jun
(34) |
Jul
(51) |
Aug
(15) |
Sep
(15) |
Oct
(35) |
Nov
(15) |
Dec
(20) |
2003 |
Jan
(31) |
Feb
(111) |
Mar
(41) |
Apr
(28) |
May
(36) |
Jun
(29) |
Jul
(27) |
Aug
(29) |
Sep
(47) |
Oct
(28) |
Nov
(7) |
Dec
(26) |
2004 |
Jan
(44) |
Feb
(9) |
Mar
(17) |
Apr
(26) |
May
(58) |
Jun
(13) |
Jul
(44) |
Aug
(64) |
Sep
(30) |
Oct
(11) |
Nov
(21) |
Dec
(28) |
2005 |
Jan
(29) |
Feb
(11) |
Mar
(11) |
Apr
(22) |
May
(85) |
Jun
(46) |
Jul
(17) |
Aug
(18) |
Sep
(14) |
Oct
(22) |
Nov
(1) |
Dec
(45) |
2006 |
Jan
(20) |
Feb
(36) |
Mar
(18) |
Apr
(24) |
May
(21) |
Jun
(48) |
Jul
(23) |
Aug
(20) |
Sep
(10) |
Oct
(41) |
Nov
(46) |
Dec
(40) |
2007 |
Jan
(40) |
Feb
(20) |
Mar
(13) |
Apr
(6) |
May
(24) |
Jun
(31) |
Jul
(30) |
Aug
(11) |
Sep
(11) |
Oct
(10) |
Nov
(56) |
Dec
(64) |
2008 |
Jan
(64) |
Feb
(22) |
Mar
(63) |
Apr
(28) |
May
(25) |
Jun
(36) |
Jul
(11) |
Aug
(9) |
Sep
(14) |
Oct
(41) |
Nov
(46) |
Dec
(130) |
2009 |
Jan
(95) |
Feb
(41) |
Mar
(24) |
Apr
(35) |
May
(53) |
Jun
(67) |
Jul
(48) |
Aug
(48) |
Sep
(86) |
Oct
(75) |
Nov
(64) |
Dec
(52) |
2010 |
Jan
(57) |
Feb
(31) |
Mar
(28) |
Apr
(40) |
May
(25) |
Jun
(42) |
Jul
(79) |
Aug
(31) |
Sep
(49) |
Oct
(66) |
Nov
(38) |
Dec
(25) |
2011 |
Jan
(29) |
Feb
(18) |
Mar
(44) |
Apr
(6) |
May
(28) |
Jun
(31) |
Jul
(36) |
Aug
(24) |
Sep
(30) |
Oct
(23) |
Nov
(21) |
Dec
(27) |
2012 |
Jan
(14) |
Feb
(11) |
Mar
(2) |
Apr
(48) |
May
(7) |
Jun
(32) |
Jul
(22) |
Aug
(25) |
Sep
(31) |
Oct
(32) |
Nov
(21) |
Dec
(17) |
2013 |
Jan
(44) |
Feb
(27) |
Mar
(3) |
Apr
(1) |
May
|
Jun
|
Jul
(3) |
Aug
(4) |
Sep
(1) |
Oct
(7) |
Nov
(5) |
Dec
(5) |
2014 |
Jan
|
Feb
|
Mar
|
Apr
(3) |
May
|
Jun
|
Jul
|
Aug
|
Sep
|
Oct
|
Nov
(3) |
Dec
(2) |
2015 |
Jan
|
Feb
|
Mar
|
Apr
|
May
(1) |
Jun
|
Jul
|
Aug
(1) |
Sep
|
Oct
|
Nov
|
Dec
|
2017 |
Jan
(7) |
Feb
|
Mar
|
Apr
|
May
|
Jun
|
Jul
|
Aug
|
Sep
|
Oct
|
Nov
|
Dec
|
2019 |
Jan
|
Feb
|
Mar
(1) |
Apr
|
May
|
Jun
|
Jul
|
Aug
|
Sep
|
Oct
|
Nov
|
Dec
|
From: Jonathan D A. <jd...@an...> - 2001-02-02 22:36:51
|
I have access to a few SGI machines running IRIX. My problem is the owner of these machines has decided to purchase MAYA instead of a compiler. I was wondering if anyone would create a IRIX build of Python and its wonderful Visual counterpart. Thank you, Jonathan Anderson |
From: Bruce S. <ba...@an...> - 2001-02-02 21:55:58
|
--On Friday, February 02, 2001 5:54 PM +0100 Markus Gritsch <gr...@iu...> wrote: > But I think there must be a way to generate some easy to use graphical > installers. Recently I installed PyOpenGL > (http://pyopengl.sourceforge.net/) and py2exe > (http://starship.python.net/crew/theller/py2exe/) and both installers > claim, "Build with distutils-1.0.1". The Registry is searched, and if > multiple Python installations are found, one can select the desired one. > All with an easy to use GUI. Thanks for the note, Markus. My negative comment about distutils was based on the standard installer for the Numeric module, and I'm happy to learn that it doesn't have to be like that. I have been the one producing installation packages, and this spring I am utterly consumed rewriting a physics textbook for publication this summer. So I can't learn yet another set of tools at this time. If someone in the VPython community can learn enough about distutils to create something which I could then just modify slightly and maintain, I'd be happy to use distutils, since it sounds like it could provide more flexibility than I have with Inno Setup. Presumably it would still be the case that one would have to install Python first? That a distutil-based installer is a Python program? Bruce |
From: Markus G. <gr...@iu...> - 2001-02-02 16:54:53
|
Hi! Some weeks ago there was a question on this list how to make the installation of VPython on Windows easier, using an installer without the need of extracting a ZIP archive to the correct location. I suggested having a look at the distutils, but got only negative feedback, because of the weird command-line nature of this mechanism. But I think there must be a way to generate some easy to use graphical installers. Recently I installed PyOpenGL (http://pyopengl.sourceforge.net/) and py2exe (http://starship.python.net/crew/theller/py2exe/) and both installers claim, "Build with distutils-1.0.1". The Registry is searched, and if multiple Python installations are found, one can select the desired one. All with an easy to use GUI. This should be no criticism but only a hint. Kind regards, Markus |
From: Ari H. <ahe...@an...> - 2001-01-31 18:03:27
|
Hi everyone, I've put up debs and rpm's of the new Linux version (with full labal/graph support) up at the VPython web page (http://virtualphoton.pc.cc.cmu.edu/projects/visual). There are a couple of bugs still in the Linux version, which I've noted on the download page. Please do post your experiences, positive and negative, to the list. Non-debian users, you will likely need to play the usual games -- install the RPMs, then recompile cvisualmodule.so with the CVS source to get things working. ari |
From: Ari H. <ahe...@an...> - 2001-01-31 17:11:00
|
On Wed, Jan 31, 2001 at 12:15:26AM -0800, David P. Reese Jr. wrote: > How platform independent is the code base of visual python? I managed to Um. As far as I know Linux is the only Unix we've got it working under (one of these days I'll give Solaris a try). But considering that it runs on Windows and Mac as well ... I'd call it pretty bloody platform independent :) > get it to compile on FreeBSD Release 4.1, but when i try to run something > that uses the visual python modules, i get the following: > > Traceback (innermost last): > File "bounce.py", line 1, in ? > from visual import * > File "/usr/local/lib/python1.5/site-packages/visual/__init__.py", line 16, in ? > import cvisual > ImportError: /usr/local/lib/python1.5/site-packages/cvisualmodule.so: > Undefined symbol "__get_eh_context" > Try doing a 'ldd /usr/local/lib/python1.5/site-packages/cvisualmodule.so' and seeing if ld is finding all of the libraries it thinks cvisualmodule.so is linked against. Considering that you *compiled* it, that means the linker *can* find all the symbols. So it's probably something dumb like a library path setting or somesuch. I'm vaguely inclined to think that symbols looks like a python internal symbol. Finding where it lives means doing an 'nm | grep __get_eh_context' on *everything* cvisualmodule.so is linked against, however ... (i guess it's not really that bad. i'll poke around and try to find it later if you're still having trouble). ari |
From: David P. R. Jr. <da...@go...> - 2001-01-31 08:15:28
|
How platform independent is the code base of visual python? I managed to get it to compile on FreeBSD Release 4.1, but when i try to run something that uses the visual python modules, i get the following: Traceback (innermost last): File "bounce.py", line 1, in ? from visual import * File "/usr/local/lib/python1.5/site-packages/visual/__init__.py", line 16, in ? import cvisual ImportError: /usr/local/lib/python1.5/site-packages/cvisualmodule.so: Undefined symbol "__get_eh_context" Has anyone even tried to get this running on FreeBSD? -- David P. Reese Jr. http://www.gomerbud.com/daver/ ----------------------------------------------------------------------- GPG Key: http://www.gomerbud.com/daver/gpg_key.asc Key fingerprint: 5D3F CC25 3C36 79DE C725 41F7 A3B1 13B9 5BC0 D39E da...@go... - gom...@du... - dp...@ca... It is simple, and therefore it is beautiful. -- Richard P. Feynman |
From: Ari H. <ahe...@an...> - 2001-01-24 00:41:24
|
On Tue, Jan 23, 2001 at 01:49:37PM -0600, Keen Wayne A Contr AFRL/MNGG wrote: > Quick question. Is VPython compatable with the stackless implementation > Not as far as I know. Why would you want it to be? ari |
From: Keen W. A C. AFRL/M. <ke...@eg...> - 2001-01-23 19:49:20
|
Quick question. Is VPython compatable with the stackless implementation dockeen |
From: Ari H. <ahe...@an...> - 2001-01-23 15:59:56
|
On Mon, Jan 22, 2001 at 11:08:23PM -0500, Bruce Sherwood wrote: > A new user sent this to me. Can anyone offer advice that I could pass on? > (He first uninstalled Python 1.5.2 and installed Python 2.0, because the > VPython web site led him to believe that he needed to do this. I've changed > the wording on the Linux download page to make it clear that we don't have > a Python 2.0 version yet, though it is being worked on.) > > > I re-installed Python 1.5.2 and went ahead and tried installing VP on > > linux (mandrake 7.0) and it had trouble finding the Numeric module, even > > though I had just installed it. Do I need to rebuild 1.5.2 from source > > with the numeric module included? > > Um, no. The C++ source doesn't depend on any numeric libraries. Your installation of numeric is probably not correct. If you start up python (should be python 1.5.2), and do an 'import Numeric', does it work? In general in reporting error messages, text descriptions are *useless* without *exact* error messages. This should have been accompanied by a trace of Python/Visual starting up and showing the problem. ari Bruce: why don't you put the list address on the VPython homepage? People should be mailing this list as a first resource, rather than you. Also, you could link to the sourceforge list archives. |
From: <ANT...@hs...> - 2001-01-23 14:50:04
|
Enclosed is your original file attachment from the message "[Edu-sig] KineticsKit - A Physics-Based General 3D Mass-Spring System" sent to you by Markus Gritsch (gr...@iu...). |
From: Bruce S. <ba...@an...> - 2001-01-23 04:07:46
|
A new user sent this to me. Can anyone offer advice that I could pass on? (He first uninstalled Python 1.5.2 and installed Python 2.0, because the VPython web site led him to believe that he needed to do this. I've changed the wording on the Linux download page to make it clear that we don't have a Python 2.0 version yet, though it is being worked on.) > I re-installed Python 1.5.2 and went ahead and tried installing VP on > linux (mandrake 7.0) and it had trouble finding the Numeric module, even > though I had just installed it. Do I need to rebuild 1.5.2 from source > with the numeric module included? > > or > > should I install Python 2.0, Numeric, build it from source, and then put > on VP? I would like to use 2.0 but want to know if it is even going to > work. Any help or suggestions would be appreciated. |
From: Ari H. <ahe...@an...> - 2001-01-18 16:20:39
|
On Thu, Jan 18, 2001 at 05:16:07PM +0100, Nils Wagner wrote: > Ari Heitner schrieb: > > And currently the graph stuff is a little broken because it's using python2 > > syntax. But Bruce just fixed that (and I'll release a new linux version one > > of these days here). > > Please send me a short note as soon as the linux version is available. I'll post to this list :) if i remember ... > Is your linux version of Vpython for the Red Hat distribution ? > I build a redhat package. But I build it on a debian system, so the library versions (especially libstdc++, which seems to have version changes every other day) frequently mismatch across distributions. So you may have to rebuild the cvisualmodule.so ... ari |
From: Ari H. <ahe...@an...> - 2001-01-18 16:11:27
|
On Thu, Jan 18, 2001 at 10:37:06AM +0100, Nils Wagner wrote: > > Please can you expand on the differences between Visual on Linux and > Visual on Windows. > I use Python2.0 and the latest development version of Vpython on Linux. > They're the same. Except for some occasional buggy behaviour on linux :) - there is at least one bug we see where visual crashes on wave.py (and a few other demos), that appears to be a GL bug (it crashes in a GL linedrawing function) - there is some weird interface behaviour with multiple windows (things respond very slowly to user input). And currently the graph stuff is a little broken because it's using python2 syntax. But Bruce just fixed that (and I'll release a new linux version one of these days here). But codewise, the Linux version is identical (modulo necessary cross-platform abstractions). ari |
From: Bruce S. <ba...@an...> - 2001-01-18 15:44:38
|
--On Thursday, January 18, 2001 10:37 AM +0100 Nils Wagner <nw...@is...> wrote: > Please can you expand on the differences between Visual on Linux and > Visual on Windows. > I use Python2.0 and the latest development version of Vpython on Linux. With respect to this question, what is on the VPython web site (http://cil.andrew.cmu.edu/projects/visual) is this: Windows: A package to add to regular Windows Python 2.0. This is our most up-to-date package. Linux: Packages for Linux Python 1.5. This doesn't include some important developments in the Visual module and in graph.py (for graphing functions). In particular, the label object is not implemented, so some recent demos don't work. However, Ari Heitner has recently implemented the label object on Linux Python 2.0 and is also working on pulling together all the related pieces (such as Numeric, upon which the Visual module depends). He hopes to have a complete coherent package very soon that will bring the Visual module up to date with the Windows version. Ari, please comment if I have misrepresented the issues! Bruce Sherwood P.S. For completeness, here is the situation on the Mac: The package on the VPython web site is up to date in terms of Visual syntax (for example, it includes the label object, and all the standard demos work). It does not include the nice version of Idle available in our Windows package. David Andersen is working on the Idle problem. |
From: Nils W. <nw...@is...> - 2001-01-18 09:37:26
|
Hi, Please can you expand on the differences between Visual on Linux and Visual on Windows. I use Python2.0 and the latest development version of Vpython on Linux. Thanks. Nils |
From: Nils W. <wag...@ho...> - 2001-01-17 20:04:37
|
Hi, Please can you help me with the attached messages wagner@moritz:~ > gdb python2.0 GNU gdb 4.18 Copyright 1998 Free Software Foundation, Inc. GDB is free software, covered by the GNU General Public License, and you are welcome to change it and/or distribute copies of it under certain conditions. Type "show copying" to see the conditions. There is absolutely no warranty for GDB. Type "show warranty" for details. This GDB was configured as "i386-suse-linux"... (gdb) run Starting program: /usr/local/bin/python2.0 Python 2.0 (#1, Oct 16 2000, 18:10:03) [GCC 2.95.2 19991024 (release)] on linux2 Type "copyright", "credits" or "license" for more information. >>>import beam20.py Visual-2000-11-26 WARNING: Python C API version mismatch for module cvisual: This Python has API version 1009, module cvisual has version 1007. 2.0 Eigenwerte [ 5.01113091e-02 3.83395753e-01 1.50249932e+00 4.17060668e+00 1.17572373e+01 2.60501596e+01 5.67453760e+01 1.13553714e+02] [New Thread 1228 (manager thread)] [New Thread 1227 (initial thread)] [New Thread 1229] WARNING: This Mesa Library includes the Glide driver but you have not defined the MESA_GLX_FX env. var. (check the README.3DFX file for more information). you can disable this message with a 'export MESA_GLX_FX=disable'. [Switching to Thread 1229] Program received signal SIGSEGV, Segmentation fault. 0x4068921e in smooth_rgba_z_line (ctx=Cannot access memory at address 0x3d056. ) at linetemp.h:516 516 linetemp.h: Datei oder Verzeichnis nicht gefunden. (gdb) backtrace #0 0x4068921e in smooth_rgba_z_line (ctx= Cannot access memory at address 0x3d056. ) at linetemp.h:516 #1 0x407c01d4 in __DTOR_END__ () from /usr/lib/libGL.so.1 Cannot access memory at address 0x3cf96. (gdb) Thanks. Nils _________________________________________________________________________ Get Your Private, Free E-mail from MSN Hotmail at http://www.hotmail.com. |
From: Markus G. <gr...@iu...> - 2001-01-17 08:36:38
|
> --On Tuesday, January 16, 2001 3:00 PM +0800 LUK ShunTim > <ce...@po...> wrote: > > > It appears that the self-installing Win32 version VPython-2001-01-15.exe > > installes to C:\VPython by deafult. (It did nod ask for ainstead of to > > my python directory which is at e:\py. Is this the default behaviour of > > have I missed something? > > I'm using the ActivePython distribution from ActiveState. I am also using ActivePython, and everything went fine. maybe a previous BeOpen Python installation is lurking around in your Registry? Markus |
From: Bruce S. <ba...@an...> - 2001-01-17 02:59:15
|
There is a new graph.py on sourceforge.net and in the VPython and Visual downloads on the Windows download page of the VPython web site. This is relevant to those running Visual on Linux, using a version of Python earlier than 2.0. The new graph.py eliminates a minor use of some syntax that is specific to Python 2.0. Bruce Sherwood |
From: Bruce S. <ba...@an...> - 2001-01-16 20:26:55
|
--On Tuesday, January 16, 2001 3:00 PM +0800 LUK ShunTim <ce...@po...> wrote: > It appears that the self-installing Win32 version VPython-2001-01-15.exe > installes to C:\VPython by deafult. (It did nod ask for ainstead of to > my python directory which is at e:\py. Is this the default behaviour of > have I missed something? > I'm using the ActivePython distribution from ActiveState. > > While the files can be moved manually, maybe it can (also) be > distributed as a zipped archive so that it can be unzipped under the > appropriate python root. Thank you for the report. I have added the following comment on the Windows download page: (If you installed a version of Python 2.0 other than the one listed above, the VPython installer may install files into a folder on the system drive named "VPython". Move these files into your Python folder. The reason for this behavior is explained in the FAQ section.) I have also added the following note to the FAQ: When we gave such a choice in the past, we found that novice users frequently installed Python into an odd location and then installed the VPython components into a different folder, so that VPython wouldn't run. Now, if the novice installs the standard Python 2.0, the VPython installer automatically determines the Python folder location by reading information in the Windows registry. This is a much safer scheme for the novice. If you have installed some other version of Python 2.0, the VPython installer may not be able to find Python and will then install into a "VPython" folder on the system drive (typically C:\). After installing, simply move the files in that folder into the Python folder. --------------------------------- Additional comment: It is advantageous to have Visual (VPython) separate from Python itself. But when we tried to have novices add VPython using a zip file, mistakes were very frequent. There is a conflict between making installation fool-proof for most novices and especially convenient for experts (and/or a minority of users who have installed some other flavor of Python). We consider the former goal more important than the latter. With the installer I'm using (Inno Setup), there doesn't seem to be a way to detect that Python couldn't be found and then (only) in that case ask for the Python folder. But I'm certainly open to suggestions for improvements. Bruce Sherwood |
From: LUK S. <ce...@po...> - 2001-01-16 06:47:41
|
Dear vpython users, It appears that the self-installing Win32 version VPython-2001-01-15.exe installes to C:\VPython by deafult. (It did nod ask for ainstead of to my python directory which is at e:\py. Is this the default behaviour of have I missed something? I'm using the ActivePython distribution from ActiveState. While the files can be moved manually, maybe it can (also) be distributed as a zipped archive so that it can be unzipped under the appropriate python root. Regards, ST -- |
From: Bruce S. <ba...@an...> - 2001-01-16 03:02:11
|
At http://cil.andrew.cmu.edu/projects/visual (and at sourceforge.net in the visualpython project) there is a new version of Python20/visual/graph.py. One of the ways to pick it up is the zip file for Visual on the Windows download page. The change is to put gcurve and gdots slightly in front of the axes, to make visible a function that happens to be zero. Bruce Sherwood |
From: Ari H. <ahe...@an...> - 2001-01-15 23:03:39
|
On Sat, Jan 13, 2001 at 07:24:00PM -0000, Nils Wagner wrote: > > wagner@moritz:~ > python > Python 1.5.2 (#1, Jul 29 2000, 14:28:37) [GCC 2.95.2 19991024 (release)] on > linux2 > Copyright 1991-1995 Stichting Mathematisch Centrum, Amsterdam > >>>from visual import * > Visual-2000-11-26 > >>>from visual.graph import * > Traceback (innermost last): > File "<stdin>", line 1, in ? > File "/usr/lib/python1.5/site-packages/visual/graph.py", line 539 > gvbars.__init__(self, **args) > ^ > SyntaxError: invalid syntax > >>> > Yeah. this is because Visual is trying to use python2 syntax (which is illegal under python 1.5). I discussed this a bit earlier (in fact in response to your question earlier this month). Hopefully I'll have a python2 package in a couple of days, actually. Till then, the graphing stuff won't work right, I'm afraid. Ari PS: please post questions like this to the visualpython-users list, so that people other than me get a chance to respond to this too (takes a lot of load off me). |
From: Bruce S. <ba...@an...> - 2001-01-13 18:21:41
|
--On Saturday, January 13, 2001 4:21 PM +0100 Markus Gritsch <gr...@iu...> wrote: > I've put together a litte webpage for KineticsKit. KineticsKit can now be > downloaded from this address: > > http://stud4.tuwien.ac.at/~e9326522/KineticsKit/ I've added this link to the "Other Links" section of the VPython web site. Thanks, Markus! Bruce Sherwood |
From: Fred Y. <fr...@on...> - 2001-01-13 16:06:35
|
Markus, Your kinetics examples are very cool. I'm amazed by what VPython can do, and your examples make good use of VPython's features. To get the "lattice" example to work I had to un-comment-out the mainloop() call at the end. That example is simply amazing, but it also manages to use every available cycle on my dual-800 NT system. I'm glad that the VPython team has made VPython so easy to install now as an add-on to Python 2.0. On Sat, Jan 13, 2001 at 04:21:00PM +0100, Markus Gritsch wrote: > I've put together a litte webpage for KineticsKit. KineticsKit can now be > downloaded from this address: > > http://stud4.tuwien.ac.at/~e9326522/KineticsKit/ -- Fred Yankowski fr...@On... tel: +1.630.879.1312 Principal Consultant www.OntoSys.com fax: +1.630.879.1370 OntoSys, Inc 38W242 Deerpath Rd, Batavia, IL 60510, USA |
From: Markus G. <gr...@iu...> - 2001-01-13 15:22:43
|
Hi! I've put together a litte webpage for KineticsKit. KineticsKit can now be downloaded from this address: http://stud4.tuwien.ac.at/~e9326522/KineticsKit/ Code enhancements: Added a second visual representation of a spring (double-helix), made a small modification to the spring constructor, added another example (picture of it can be seen at the top of the webpage). enjoy, Markus |