|
From: Henk K. <h....@cy...> - 2007-07-26 07:54:56
|
Op donderdag 26 juli 2007 03:37, schreef u: > Not possible to guess what went wrong with the make of the > standard version without seeing the build.log in the src > directory, which gives details. > Thanks for pointing to this log: "boost" is missing ... ../../visual-3.2.9/include/cvisual.h:8:47: error: boost/python/detail/wrap_python.hpp: No such file or directory ../../visual-3.2.9/include/cvisual.h:12:34: error: boost/python/tuple.hpp: No such file or directory ../../visual-3.2.9/include/cvisual.h:13:33: error: boost/python/list.hpp: No such file or directory In file included from ../../visual-3.2.9/include/prim.h:8, > As for the beta version, again it's difficult to diagnose from > what you report, but perhaps not all the numpy pieces are in fact > installed? Including the dev component? > numpy relies on blas/libblas so I installed it with suse's yast. However suse's blas seems to contain a fortran-write statement to stdout/unit 6/* which cannot be resolved: > > "/usr/lib/python2.4/site-packages/numpy/linalg/linalg.py", line > > 25, in ? > > from numpy.linalg import lapack_lite > > ImportError: /usr/lib/libblas.so.3: undefined symbol: > > _gfortran_st_write > > configure:19592: result: no > > configure:19599: error: The numpy module could not be found but > > is required. See numpy.sourceforge.net for downloads. > > hunting down blas, recompiling lapack is not that difficult, when lapack is all what has to to be compiled (hm I see a leading underscore... underscore usage in the lib usage maybe needs some attention as well). I will go after boost first. Thanks. Henk |