Re: [Visualpython-users] no-go with new (and old!) visual on linux

[Jonathan B. <jbr...@ea...>]

On Sun, 2004-07-25 at 15:12, Martin Gelfand wrote:
> I've resolved the problem with the old visual.  On rebuilding, there
> was an error that libGL.so did not exist.  It did, but it was a link
> to libGL.so.1.2, which did not exist.  However, libGL.so.1 did exist,
> as a link to libGL.so.1.0.5336.  Pointing libGL.so to libGL.so.1 allowed
> visual to build, and it runs fine again.
> 
> Does that constitute a bug in xlibmesa-gl-dev (the package which
> appears to own /usr/lib/libGL.so)?

I think that the symlink from libGL.so to the correct file is provided
by nvidia-glx-dev.

> Onward to visual-3.0...  And thanks, Jonathan, for your assistance.

You're welcome,
-Jonathan