From: <art...@rs...> - 2002-03-14 23:33:02
|
>I think Bruce & co. are doing a great job. It is indeed difficult to >install on anything other than systems just like the developers have, but >it's getting a lot better a lot faster. Definitely not easy. My original post was in its own way an offer to pitch in as I could. If Bruce & co want to focus their approach on the needs of their immediate audience of physics students - I was offering to help devise/maintain a distribution approach more appropriate to a general audience. The larger and broader the VPython user base, probably the better for all of us who have an interest in it. >Speaking from long experience, I can attest that managing a free software >program is a *lot* of work. Managing it in coordination with other >rapidly-changing free software[*] is a lot more work squared. The more we >other users can help out with advice for fellow users and with patches, >the more time the developers can spend on the core visual module. Again , the broader and more active the the user base - the better off we all are. And an important reward for undertaking a free software effort is the recognition of one's efforts from others who use it and incorporate it into their own work. Which is why - as a matter of principle - I push the Numeric issue. When no one is asking for money, there is no reason anyone should be shortchanged. Not implying that we are talking about anything more than an unintentional oversight - which is easy enough to happen in the heat of battle. But do you agree that it is only appropriate to put Numeric up on the 'VPython includes' marquee? Art |