vim-latex-devel Mailing List for Vim-Latex (Page 73)
Brought to you by:
srinathava,
tmaas
You can subscribe to this list here.
2002 |
Jan
|
Feb
|
Mar
|
Apr
|
May
|
Jun
|
Jul
|
Aug
|
Sep
|
Oct
|
Nov
(120) |
Dec
(118) |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
2003 |
Jan
(145) |
Feb
(23) |
Mar
(30) |
Apr
(50) |
May
(88) |
Jun
(49) |
Jul
(41) |
Aug
(13) |
Sep
(51) |
Oct
(30) |
Nov
(80) |
Dec
(43) |
2004 |
Jan
(15) |
Feb
(25) |
Mar
(48) |
Apr
(12) |
May
(37) |
Jun
(52) |
Jul
(16) |
Aug
(10) |
Sep
(7) |
Oct
(19) |
Nov
(17) |
Dec
(19) |
2005 |
Jan
(15) |
Feb
(5) |
Mar
(7) |
Apr
(3) |
May
(2) |
Jun
(4) |
Jul
(3) |
Aug
(1) |
Sep
(1) |
Oct
(1) |
Nov
(16) |
Dec
(16) |
2006 |
Jan
(15) |
Feb
(27) |
Mar
(49) |
Apr
(31) |
May
(24) |
Jun
(12) |
Jul
(23) |
Aug
(13) |
Sep
(22) |
Oct
(6) |
Nov
(8) |
Dec
(10) |
2007 |
Jan
(3) |
Feb
(13) |
Mar
(19) |
Apr
(1) |
May
(5) |
Jun
(10) |
Jul
(2) |
Aug
(13) |
Sep
(10) |
Oct
(2) |
Nov
(30) |
Dec
(15) |
2008 |
Jan
(11) |
Feb
(9) |
Mar
(27) |
Apr
(27) |
May
(22) |
Jun
(29) |
Jul
|
Aug
(21) |
Sep
(6) |
Oct
(4) |
Nov
(9) |
Dec
(2) |
2009 |
Jan
(52) |
Feb
(21) |
Mar
(9) |
Apr
(41) |
May
(13) |
Jun
(8) |
Jul
(5) |
Aug
(31) |
Sep
(14) |
Oct
(10) |
Nov
(17) |
Dec
(17) |
2010 |
Jan
(25) |
Feb
(22) |
Mar
(22) |
Apr
(24) |
May
(35) |
Jun
(23) |
Jul
(22) |
Aug
(10) |
Sep
(6) |
Oct
(29) |
Nov
(8) |
Dec
(6) |
2011 |
Jan
(12) |
Feb
(89) |
Mar
(41) |
Apr
(8) |
May
(17) |
Jun
(11) |
Jul
(3) |
Aug
(13) |
Sep
(14) |
Oct
(23) |
Nov
(8) |
Dec
(9) |
2012 |
Jan
(15) |
Feb
(27) |
Mar
(6) |
Apr
(17) |
May
(29) |
Jun
(9) |
Jul
(50) |
Aug
(15) |
Sep
(11) |
Oct
(12) |
Nov
(22) |
Dec
(7) |
2013 |
Jan
(24) |
Feb
(32) |
Mar
(6) |
Apr
(5) |
May
(2) |
Jun
(15) |
Jul
(20) |
Aug
(1) |
Sep
(3) |
Oct
(2) |
Nov
(7) |
Dec
(4) |
2014 |
Jan
(3) |
Feb
(7) |
Mar
(4) |
Apr
|
May
(4) |
Jun
(5) |
Jul
(4) |
Aug
(3) |
Sep
(9) |
Oct
|
Nov
(2) |
Dec
(3) |
2015 |
Jan
|
Feb
(4) |
Mar
(9) |
Apr
|
May
(1) |
Jun
|
Jul
(5) |
Aug
(6) |
Sep
(2) |
Oct
|
Nov
(6) |
Dec
|
2016 |
Jan
(1) |
Feb
(11) |
Mar
(4) |
Apr
(2) |
May
(8) |
Jun
(9) |
Jul
|
Aug
(9) |
Sep
(2) |
Oct
(7) |
Nov
|
Dec
|
2017 |
Jan
(7) |
Feb
|
Mar
(5) |
Apr
|
May
|
Jun
|
Jul
|
Aug
|
Sep
|
Oct
|
Nov
|
Dec
(4) |
2018 |
Jan
(1) |
Feb
|
Mar
|
Apr
(2) |
May
|
Jun
|
Jul
|
Aug
|
Sep
|
Oct
(1) |
Nov
|
Dec
|
2019 |
Jan
|
Feb
|
Mar
|
Apr
(3) |
May
|
Jun
|
Jul
|
Aug
|
Sep
(4) |
Oct
|
Nov
|
Dec
|
2020 |
Jan
|
Feb
|
Mar
|
Apr
|
May
(2) |
Jun
(1) |
Jul
(2) |
Aug
|
Sep
|
Oct
|
Nov
|
Dec
|
2021 |
Jan
|
Feb
(5) |
Mar
|
Apr
|
May
|
Jun
|
Jul
|
Aug
|
Sep
|
Oct
|
Nov
|
Dec
|
2022 |
Jan
(1) |
Feb
|
Mar
|
Apr
|
May
|
Jun
|
Jul
|
Aug
|
Sep
|
Oct
|
Nov
|
Dec
|
From: Berta M. <ber...@ar...> - 2005-02-15 09:14:54
|
Hello Ryan, I have a similar problem with Acrobat. But now I use GhostView previewer. If you go on with using Acrobat, you haven't close Acrobat everytime you want to re-open the file. Closing the file (the opened window) with ^W will works to. Have a nice day, Milan On Thu, Dec 02, 2004 at 02:39:07PM -0800, Ryan Krauss wrote: > > I am having a problem with the latex viewer command. It works correctly as long as > Acrobat is not already open, but if Acrobat is open, it says it can't find the file. I was > able to duplicate the problem and a potential solution by typing the same commands > vim-latex is using directly into a dos command window open to the correct directory. > Acrobat seems to need the full path to the file if it is already open, even if the command > (i.e. start Acrobat filename) is coming from a DOS prompt open to the correct > directory. Acrobat could handle this correctly if passed the full path to the file. I > don't want to close Acrobat every time because it takes a while to open. How can the > vim-latex command be made to include the full path to the pdf file? > > > ------------------------------------------------------- > SF email is sponsored by - The IT Product Guide > Read honest & candid reviews on hundreds of IT Products from real users. > Discover which products truly live up to the hype. Start reading now. > http://productguide.itmanagersjournal.com/ > _______________________________________________ > Vim-latex-devel mailing list > Vim...@li... > https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/vim-latex-devel |
From: Christian E. <bla...@gm...> - 2005-02-14 11:18:13
|
hello, Is there a possibility to switch off key mappings by group like switching off the math menu in texrc with TexLet g:Tex_MathMenus = 0 Do I have to edit main.cf by hand or have I overlooked something? Very often I do stuff w/o math or greek, so the mappings get in the way sometimes. c -- --->> <http://www.blacktrash.org/> |
From: Berta M. <ber...@ar...> - 2005-02-08 20:26:32
|
On Tue, Feb 08, 2005 at 05:36:22PM +0100, Fabio Stumbo wrote: > Finally, I would like to ask a question to which I have not been able to > find an answer in the documentation: quite often I happen to edit plain > tex files. How can I toggle the command \ll to use "tex" instead of > "latex"? > I defined > > noremap \latex :let g:Tex_CompileRule_dvi = 'latex -src-specials > -interaction=nonstopmode $*'<CR> > noremap \tex :let g:Tex_CompileRule_dvi = 'tex -src-specials > -interaction=nonstopmode $*'<CR> > > in my .vimrc, so that I just type "\tex" once after starting and then \ll > works as I want, but I feel this is not the "best" way to achieve this. I think this is the best way to solve this. If you edit and compile plainTeX files once for a time, it is better to use some mapping that edit the ${HOME}/.vimrc and there comment or uncomment some lines. For fifty:fifty usage of plainTeX and LaTeX maybe modeline option can help: ----- begin (part of .vimrc) ----- " check three line for commands in each file set modeline modelines=3 ----- end (part of .vimrc) ----- I can image that I use often some files either in plain- either in La- and their first (or last) [N] lines are next: % vim:set let g:Tex_CompileRule_dvi = 'latex -src-specials -interaction=nonstopmode $*' and similarly with tex program. I use latex-suite for a quite long time (I am very satisfied with it :) and also vim, but I don't know other way how to solve this. Have a nice day, Milan |
From: Fabio S. <f.s...@un...> - 2005-02-08 16:37:47
|
Hi all, I already wrote a message similar to this one but as unsubscribed user and I never got any kind of reply: maybe I made some error. So please forgive me if you just didn't reply because the question was not worth... The point is that if I have a file starting with a number, when I start xdvi with \ls I get an error saying "No references to source file ".tex" in DVI file." Please remark that everything is well configured in order that reverse and forward search work properly. Moreover, renaming the very same with a name made only of letters everything works fine. This is a problem coming, I guess, from xdvi and the way it is called within vim-latex. Reading from man xdvi: The space before filename is only needed if the filename starts with a digit. When the space is used, the argument needs to be enclosed in quotes to prevent the shell from misinterpreting the space as argument separator. I solved, for the moment, defining noremap <F3> :exe '!xdvi -nofork -sourceposition "' . line (".") . ' ' . expand("%") . '" ' . expand("%:p:r"). " &" \| redraw!<cr> in my .vimrc, but I don't know how to fix it in vim-latex. Moreover, with the same kind of file, sometime I experience a problem with the .log file: typesetting it over and over again with \ll, sometime I get and error from gvim saying that the log file is already open. But I have not been able to produce such error in a systematic way. Finally, I would like to ask a question to which I have not been able to find an answer in the documentation: quite often I happen to edit plain tex files. How can I toggle the command \ll to use "tex" instead of "latex"? I defined noremap \latex :let g:Tex_CompileRule_dvi = 'latex -src-specials -interaction=nonstopmode $*'<CR> noremap \tex :let g:Tex_CompileRule_dvi = 'tex -src-specials -interaction=nonstopmode $*'<CR> in my .vimrc, so that I just type "\tex" once after starting and then \ll works as I want, but I feel this is not the "best" way to achieve this. TIA and best greetings Fabio Stumbo |
From: Berta M. <ber...@ar...> - 2005-02-07 10:18:57
|
Hello, I want to suggest the change of $VIM/latex-suite/bibtex.vim file. I think its better for LaTeX and BIBTeX porgrams to use the following syntax: @ARTICLE{ author = "A. Author", title = "Title T.", journal = "Journal J.", ... } not the following one, which is currently used: @ARTICLE{ author = {A. Author}, title = {Title T.}, journal = {Journal J.}, ... } Of course so on with @BOOK and the other 12 items. It's because of: - "sth" means that it is the set of strings (and expected ending is the comma) and - {sth} means that it should be taken to LaTeX without changing the case (to make some title lower-case), and it is sometimes used inside of "sth" (like this "sth1 {ST}h2 sth3"). It is also a suggested construction for bibtex program (search for documentation on BIBTeX program called btxdoc.ps or btxdoc.pdf with Google). I changed my own bibtex.vim file and it works for me the way I want. I think it's not polite to send the whole file to the conference, but the changes are not so big, so I attach the file with differencies to the message (generated by diff program). If I am not right, plea and reclamation are welcome. Greetings! Milan Milan Berta Faculty of Mathematics and Physics Charles University, Prague |
From: Fabian B. <f.b...@gm...> - 2005-01-31 17:00:15
|
Hi, I found it :-) Like with the 'tags'-stuff there was an old file in the same directory as 'latex-suite' which converted these ... Greetings! -- Fabian Braennstroem Duesseldorf/Berlin |
From: Fabian B. <f.b...@gm...> - 2005-01-31 16:35:44
|
Hello, * VIM-Latex schrieb am 19 Jan 2005: > > Hi, > > sorry, it's me again, but unfortunately I have problems with > the 'taglist.vim' plugin. > I just read that about the new features from 2003-09-28 that > 'taglist.vim' is supported: > > 2. > taglist.vim support > > As I mentioned earlier taglist.vim is the most popular interface to > ctags (also popular program). Support is enabled by default. You have to > have only taglist.vim (2.8 is enough) and ctags (at least 5.0). You > don"t need to configure anything else. Use :Tlist command (taglist.vim) > to open window with tags in current file. > > Currently I am using 'vim-latex 20040314', 'taglist.vim' > version 3.4 and 'ctags' version 5.5.4. So the requirements > should be fullfilled. > > On the other hand, I thought that ctags does not support any latex files > and somehow it does not work for me to produce any tags-file!? So I used > 'ltags' to produce a tag-file, but somehow invoking ':Tlist' for > 'taglist' does not work on a latex-file (for my .vimrc it works nice)!? > I get following error-message: > > Taglist: Failed to generate tags for /home/fab/HOME/HomePage/latex_dissertation.tex > ctags: Warning: Ignoring non-option in /home/fab/.ctags^@^@ctags: > Warning: Invalid content of \{\}^@ctags: Warning: Invalid content of > \{\}^@ctags: Unknown language specified in "language-force" option^@ > Hit ENTER or type command to continue > > That sounds that 'tagslist' wants to produce a tags-file again, but > 'ctags' is not able to handle latex-files, isn't it? > > Do you have an ideas to get my tags to work? If anybody is interested: It works now :-) I found some old stuff which was not neede... Greetings! -- Fabian Braennstroem Duesseldorf/Berlin |
From: Fabian B. <f.b...@gm...> - 2005-01-31 07:11:54
|
Hallo VIM-Latex, * VIM-Latex schrieb am 19 Jan 2005: > Hi, > > * VIM-Latex schrieb am 13 Jan 2005: > > > > > Hi, > > > > I am using vim-latex for a while now and like it a lot. > > Unfortunately I have some problems with some characters. > > Especially all my greek letters convert after saving the > > document to some strange characters. The same happens to > > german umlaut-characters, but just when I open up an old > > latex-document which was written in emacs-auctex mode. > > > > Could anybody tell me where I can find the setting for the > > automatic conversion of the greek letters (the german > > umlaute are not so important)? > > Sorry, but does nobody have any idea or did I miss it in the > manual? I saw now that not only the greek letters, but also the the smart mapping '\dots' converts to some unreadable characters after saving. Of course, I could take this smart mapping out, but there exist probably a better way. Is there a way to turn this conversion off? Greetings! -- Fabian Braennstroem Duesseldorf/Berlin |
From: Brian K. <bk...@gm...> - 2005-01-30 21:31:44
|
I have a probelm getting vimlatex to compile either ps or pdf using format dependency. Here are my vimrc settings. let g:Tex_CompileRule_dvi = 'latex --src-specials -interaction=nonstopmode $*' let g:Tex_CompileRule_ps = 'dvips -t letter -Ppdf -o $*.ps $*.dvi' let g:Tex_FormatDependency_ps = 'dvi,ps' If I have no format dependency and the dvi exists, a ps file is produced. If I set the format dependency as shown, it produces a dvi file, but not a post script file. I get similar behaviour for pdf's. I'm using the csv version. I had the same problem with the latest development version (December 19, 2004). Any ideas what might be causing this? -- Brian Keats |
From: Fabian B. <f.b...@gm...> - 2005-01-20 12:32:29
|
Hi, sorry, it's me again, but unfortunately I have problems with the 'taglist.vim' plugin. I just read that about the new features from 2003-09-28 that 'taglist.vim' is supported: 2. taglist.vim support As I mentioned earlier taglist.vim is the most popular interface to ctags (also popular program). Support is enabled by default. You have to have only taglist.vim (2.8 is enough) and ctags (at least 5.0). You don"t need to configure anything else. Use :Tlist command (taglist.vim) to open window with tags in current file. Currently I am using 'vim-latex 20040314', 'taglist.vim' version 3.4 and 'ctags' version 5.5.4. So the requirements should be fullfilled. On the other hand, I thought that ctags does not support any latex files and somehow it does not work for me to produce any tags-file!? So I used 'ltags' to produce a tag-file, but somehow invoking ':Tlist' for 'taglist' does not work on a latex-file (for my .vimrc it works nice)!? I get following error-message: Taglist: Failed to generate tags for /home/fab/HOME/HomePage/latex_dissertation.tex ctags: Warning: Ignoring non-option in /home/fab/.ctags^@^@ctags: Warning: Invalid content of \{\}^@ctags: Warning: Invalid content of \{\}^@ctags: Unknown language specified in "language-force" option^@ Hit ENTER or type command to continue That sounds that 'tagslist' wants to produce a tags-file again, but 'ctags' is not able to handle latex-files, isn't it? Do you have an ideas to get my tags to work? Best Greetings! -- Fabian Braennstroem Duesseldorf/Berlin |
From: Fabian B. <f.b...@gm...> - 2005-01-20 11:10:42
|
Hi, * VIM-Latex schrieb am 13 Jan 2005: > > Hi, > > I am using vim-latex for a while now and like it a lot. > Unfortunately I have some problems with some characters. > Especially all my greek letters convert after saving the > document to some strange characters. The same happens to > german umlaut-characters, but just when I open up an old > latex-document which was written in emacs-auctex mode. > > Could anybody tell me where I can find the setting for the > automatic conversion of the greek letters (the german > umlaute are not so important)? Sorry, but does nobody have any idea or did I miss it in the manual? Greetings! -- Fabian Braennstroem Duesseldorf/Berlin |
From: Rolf <vim...@so...> - 2005-01-20 10:36:31
|
VIM 6.1 on Solaris with X11-Motif GUI When opening a tex file in gvim directly hitting \lv loads xdvi. But when first the document is compiled \ll then xdvi doesn't show up anymore after \lv. In fact any program started with ":!progam &" doesn't start. But ":!program" starts normaly. "set noguipty" fixes the problem to. May be vim bug, also appears with the vimspell package. |
From: James <vim...@so...> - 2005-01-17 18:15:55
|
Hello, I've installed Vim 6.2 and the LaTeX-suite on my Mac which runs OS X 10.3.2, but I can't seem to get LatTeX to work properly. (I installed the version of LaTeX-suite dated December 19, 2004 on the "Download" page.) I have problems ranging from minor to serious: 1. The LaTeX-suite menus seem incomplete. For example TeX-Suite -> Templates just shows numbers 1:,2:,3:, and 4:. Shouldn't actually list the available templates like "article" etc.? 2. To fold, the tutorial says "In normal mode, press \rf", but how does this <mapleader> stuff work? I know that I can refresh fold using the menu, but I would really like to use keystrokes. Is there a reference that explains the use of mapleaders simply? 3. Following the tutorial I tried \ref{<f9>} and \ref{<f9>, and a number of other variations, but I can't get the auto completion to work. All I get is 'No bibkey, label or word beginning with "" ', even though \label{eqn:euler} is clearly there. I'm not sure if this is relevant or not, but TLook and related commands seem to work fine. 4. Compile doesn't seem to work properly. When I envoke the compiler from the menu, in one window it says tcsh: Missing } and in the [Error List] it says :silent! call Tex_RunLaTex() When I do :call Tex_RunLaTex() I get a bunch of errors (*not* E117: Unknown function though). If I need to configure my compiler rules, g:Tex_CompileRule_dvi how do I find out what to change the default string to? Thank you in advance for your help. James |
From: Fabian B. <f.b...@gm...> - 2005-01-17 08:33:13
|
Hi, * Alexandre schrieb am 15 Jan 2005: > Fabian Braennstroem a écrit : > >Hi, > > > >I would like to which spell-checker you use for your > >latex-documents? > >In the beginning I use 'vimspell.vim', but it seems that it > >does not work in conjunction with vim-latex. Did anybody had > >the same experience? > > Hi I use vimspell.vim and vim-latex together on a Debian-testing > environment. Few problems for now, Just from time to time the "space > allready defined" msg but no criticall error. Unfortunately I have some more problems (like a lot of error messages and opening an extra 'buffer'), but maybe it is just some keybinding. I will check it again. > > however, during the holydays, I tried to have them work together on > windows XP and they tdidn't seem to apreciate each other. Actually, even > using wimspell.vim alone was very difficult, since the wimspell mode > couldn't be disabled and the on-the-fly stuff was too slow for my typing. Right now, I just using Linux, but good to know for the future. Thanks and Greetings! -- Fabian Braennstroem Duesseldorf/Berlin |
From: Fabian B. <f.b...@gm...> - 2005-01-17 08:29:49
|
Hi, * Luc schrieb am 15 Jan 2005: > Hello, > > * On Thu, Jan 13, 2005 at 10:17:27AM +0100, Fabian Braennstroem <f.b...@gm...> wrote: > > I would like to which spell-checker you use for your latex-documents? > > Personnally I use the plugin I maintain every once and a while > (lhVimSpell). It has always been quite experimental and sometimes > unstable. Thanks! I will take a look at it. Greetings! -- Fabian Braennstroem Duesseldorf/Berlin |
From: Luc H. <her...@fr...> - 2005-01-15 01:14:04
|
Hello, * On Thu, Jan 13, 2005 at 10:17:27AM +0100, Fabian Braennstroem <f.b...@gm...> wrote: > I would like to which spell-checker you use for your latex-documents? Personnally I use the plugin I maintain every once and a while (lhVimSpell). It has always been quite experimental and sometimes unstable. > I would like to have the flyspell feature, but as I know it > 'vimspell.vim' is the only one who can do it. lhVimSpell does not support the flyspell feature. HTH, -- Luc Hermitte http://hermitte.free.fr/vim/ |
From: Fabian B. <f.b...@gm...> - 2005-01-14 09:14:02
|
Hi, I would like to which spell-checker you use for your latex-documents? In the beginning I use 'vimspell.vim', but it seems that it does not work in conjunction with vim-latex. Did anybody had the same experience? I would like to have the flyspell feature, but as I know it 'vimspell.vim' is the only one who can do it. Maybe, you guys have some hints!? Best Greetings! Fabian |
From: Fabian B. <f.b...@gm...> - 2005-01-14 09:09:48
|
Hi, I am using vim-latex for a while now and like it a lot. Unfortunately I have some problems with some characters. Especially all my greek letters convert after saving the document to some strange characters. The same happens to german umlaut-characters, but just when I open up an old latex-document which was written in emacs-auctex mode. Could anybody tell me where I can find the setting for the automatic conversion of the greek letters (the german umlaute are not so important)? Best Greetings! Fabian |
From: Marino <mar...@ya...> - 2005-01-13 07:37:33
|
Srinath: I think its a great idea! > 1. Calculating a difference which is not not line by line but sentence by > sentence or even word by word. I beleive that this is an easy problem. Recently I came across a Vim tip which might give you a lead on how to implement the "easy part". Please take a look at: Tip #780: Generalized VISUAL CONTENT onto COMMAND-LINE http://www.vim.org/tips/tip.php?tip_id=780 It deals with searching a long sentence which may be multiline in the document. Marino ___________________________________________________________ ALL-NEW Yahoo! Messenger - all new features - even more fun! http://uk.messenger.yahoo.com |
From: Srinath A. <sr...@fa...> - 2005-01-13 00:54:53
|
Hello all, Its been a long time since the list has seen any emails... I've been busy and it looks like other than the occassional, "why can I not use my alt keys" email, there have been no major bugs. Recently, I was thinking of the next cool thing which could be done in latex-suite. An idea came up while talking with a friend... I've written up a description of the idea etc... Please take a look and see if you think its interesting... I am open to ideas on how to implement this. Idea follows: Normally, we view the diff between two text files on a line by line basis. This works fine for code where most logical structure is demarcated on a line by line basis. (obfuscators notwithstanding). However, for flowing text, which latex files resemble more than code, it does not quite make sense to have differences highlighted on a line by line basis. "Units" of language can be thought to be sentences. The idea is therefore, a way to view a diff between two files in a non line by line manner. Vertically diffsplit windows are also something which work only for line by line diffs. So for example, suppose one of the files is this: ================================================== Vertically diffsplit windows are also something which work only for line by line diffs. For diffs which do not follow the constraint of end of lines, the most intuitive way to view diffs seems to be to have a single window having one version of the file which the differences basically shown interpersed in the same view. ================================================== and another is this ================================================== Vertically diffsplit windows are also something which work only for line by line diffs. For diffs which do not follow the constraint of eol's, the most intuitive way to view differences between files seems to be to have a single window having one version of the file which the differences basically shown interpersed in the same view. ================================================== Note how the change from "end of line" to "eol" makes two lines change, although logically, it was only one change. If we run a simple diff between the two files using vim's native diffsplit, then apart from the first two lines which are identical, every other line will show a diff. In actual fact, there are only a couple of changes: end of lines -> eol's diffs -> differences between files So what is needed is obviously a way to convey to the user the two actual differences. This is a two part problem: 1. Calculating a difference which is not not line by line but sentence by sentence or even word by word. I beleive that this is an easy problem. I already have written up a simple python program which prints the word by difference. So for example, for the two files above, it would generate the following output: ================================================== Vertically diffsplit windows are also something which work only for line by line diffs. For diffs which do not follow the constraint of <+end of lines+><-eol's->, the most intuitive way to view <+diffs+><-differences between files-> seems to be to have a single window having one version of the file which the differences basically shown interpersed in the same view. ================================================== 2. Find a way to convey this diference to the user in a easily graspable way. This in my opinion is the hard part. Ideally, if Vim had in-line folding, the "<+original text+>" would be folded away and we would show a little "?" in its place. The "<-new text->" would be shown with the "<-" and "->" parts folded away and the "new text" colored differently. I tried Vince Ngeri's conceal patch and couldn't get it to work quite reliably... Whenever I split another window, strange things happen to the highlighting... The concealed text reappears etc... If someone can get it to work robustly, that will be cool. If someone can think of a completely different way to present the diff without the conceal patch, that will be even cooler. (I cannot think of a way). Thanks, Srinath |
From: Srinath A. <sr...@fa...> - 2004-12-19 20:13:44
|
On Thu, 18 Nov 2004, martin f krafft wrote: > $ mkdir /tmp/latexhang > $ cd !$ > $ touch a.tex a.tex.latexmain b.tex > $ screen -dm vim a.tex > $ vim b.tex > [...] > > Some times, a ctrl-c enables the editing of b.tex. I could reproduce this. Its a trivial bug to fix, sorry for taking so long. What happens is that when you do: screen -dm vim a.tex vim has already created a .a.tex.swp file and then detached. Therefore, when you do vim b.tex vim puts up the "This file is already being edited..." message and expects the user to press a key to continue. But at this time, latex-suite has already made some settings which makes this message "dissapear". Infact, if you had pressed 'r', things would have continued... But it looks like things have hung. Please upgrade to the latest release to get the fix. -- Srinath NOTE: If you are not subscribed to vim-latex-devel, then further replies to the list will be silently ignored. Please subscribe if you wish to continue the thread, or use From: vim...@so...valid Reply-To: yo...@em...dress, vim...@li... in the header. |
From: <naz...@no...> - 2004-12-19 01:46:54
|
Hello, I have been experiencing problems with completion under windows : windows version : XP gvim version : 6.3 latex-suite version : 1.5 I installed the grep program from the address given in the vim-latex website : http://unxutils.sourceforge.net/ and changed the windows path environment accordingly to the binaries location. However, completion would not work at all, Then, I found Ryan Krauss' post that specified that only cygwin grep program would work because it was the only one which would give the file name when given the "-H" option. I installed cygwin, changed the path again and know it seems to work OK. however, I have tried to compare the outputs given by both greps : win-version : C:\Vim>grep --version grep (GNU grep) 2.4.2 Copyright 1988, 1992-1999, 2000 Free Software Foundation, Inc. This is free software; see the source for copying conditions. There is NO warranty; not even for MERCHANTABILITY or FITNESS FOR A PARTICULAR PURPOSE. C:\Vim>grep -nH if _vimrc _vimrc:6:set diffexpr=MyDiff() _vimrc:7:function MyDiff() _vimrc:9: if &diffopt =~ 'icase' | let opt = opt . '-i ' | endif _vimrc:10: if &diffopt =~ 'iwhite' | let opt = opt . '-b ' | endif _vimrc:12: if arg1 =~ ' ' | let arg1 = '"' . arg1 . '"' | endif _vimrc:14: if arg2 =~ ' ' | let arg2 = '"' . arg2 . '"' | endif _vimrc:16: if arg3 =~ ' ' | let arg3 = '"' . arg3 . '"' | endif _vimrc:17: silent execute '!C:\Vim\vim63\diff ' . opt . arg1 . ' ' . arg2 . ' > ' . arg3 _vimrc:20:set guifont=Bitstream_Vera_Sans_Mono:h9:cANSI _vimrc:28:" IMPORTANT: grep will sometimes skip displaying the file name if you cygwin version : C:\Vim>grep --version grep (GNU grep) 2.5 Copyright 1988, 1992-1999, 2000, 2001 Free Software Foundation, Inc. This is free software; see the source for copying conditions. There is NO warranty; not even for MERCHANTABILITY or FITNESS FOR A PARTICULAR PURPOSE. C:\Vim>grep -nH if _vimrc _vimrc:6:set diffexpr=MyDiff() _vimrc:7:function MyDiff() _vimrc:9: if &diffopt =~ 'icase' | let opt = opt . '-i ' | endif _vimrc:10: if &diffopt =~ 'iwhite' | let opt = opt . '-b ' | endif _vimrc:12: if arg1 =~ ' ' | let arg1 = '"' . arg1 . '"' | endif _vimrc:14: if arg2 =~ ' ' | let arg2 = '"' . arg2 . '"' | endif _vimrc:16: if arg3 =~ ' ' | let arg3 = '"' . arg3 . '"' | endif _vimrc:17: silent execute '!C:\Vim\vim63\diff ' . opt . arg1 . ' ' . arg2 . ' > ' . arg3 _vimrc:20:set guifont=Bitstream_Vera_Sans_Mono:h9:cANSI _vimrc:28:" IMPORTANT: grep will sometimes skip displaying the file name if you The versions are different but the outputs sound exactly the same to me. So what is the difference ? Isn't there a way to avoid installing cygwin in order to have completion working ? thanks, A. Fournier P.D. I have also tried downloading the latest grep from gnuwin32 but it still doesn't work |
From: Ryan L. <rd...@gm...> - 2004-12-16 18:59:16
|
I apologize if this is a duplicate. I sent this yesterday but never received a copy, even though I have set up my account to receive my own messages. I checked the archives and could not find the answer to this problem. I am using gvim on Mac OS 10.3. My target format is PDF. When I compile, it will not run Bibtex. The files and my bibtex installation are not the problem, because if I run it manually (:!bibtex filename) it works. Here are the lines in my texrc: TexLet g:Tex_MultipleCompileFormats = 'dvi,pdf' TexLet g:Tex_BibtexFlavor = 'bibtex' TexLet g:Tex_CompileRule_bib = g:Tex_BibtexFlavor . ' $*' Any idea why multiple-compilation is not working? Thank you. |
From: Ryan L. <rd...@gm...> - 2004-12-15 21:39:35
|
I checked the archives and could not find the answer to this problem. I am using gvim on Mac OS 10.3. My target format is PDF. When I compile, it will not run Bibtex. The files and my bibtex installation are not the problem, because if I run it manually (:!bibtex filename) it works. Here are the lines in my texrc: TexLet g:Tex_MultipleCompileFormats = 'dvi,pdf' TexLet g:Tex_BibtexFlavor = 'bibtex' TexLet g:Tex_CompileRule_bib = g:Tex_BibtexFlavor . ' $*' Any idea why multiple-compilation is not working? Thank you. |
From: Christian E. <bla...@gm...> - 2004-12-10 23:12:43
|
* Brent on Fri, Dec 10, 2004 at 01:32PM -0800: > Is there a way to unfold all sections in a document? zR -- Nichts gibt so sehr das Gefühl der Unendlichkeit als wie die Dummheit - Ödön von Horváth |