Hello,
I have a standard dualboot setup installed in BIOS/MBR mode:
sda 8
├─sda1 8:1 0 1,2G 0 part SYSTEM_DRV
├─sda2 8:2 0 136,1G 0 part Windows10_OS
└─sda3 8:3 0 95G 0 part
└─cryptroot 253:0 0 95G 0 crypt /
Partition sda3 is encrypted with LUKS and includes boot directory (with Linux kernel files and grub.cfg.
Using latest Grub2 includes the following features:
No dedicated boot Partition required
supports booting bootmgr directly and chainloading of partition boot sector is no longer required (to boot Windows in a BIOS/MBR setup)
The main question is:
Which bootloader must be installed in MBR? Veracrypt bootloader or Grub2?
I prefer Grub2 for the reason of it's features mentioned before.
This means Grub2 can boot directly from system partition that has /bootmgr.
But how can I boot an encrypted system partition (sda2, Windows10_OS) with VeraCrypt?
Would it make sense to put VeraCrypt bootloader to sda1, SYSTEM_DRV?
THX
If you would like to refer to this comment somewhere else in this project, copy and paste the following link:
Hello,
I have a standard dualboot setup installed in BIOS/MBR mode:
Partition sda3 is encrypted with LUKS and includes boot directory (with Linux kernel files and grub.cfg.
Using latest Grub2 includes the following features:
The main question is:
Which bootloader must be installed in MBR? Veracrypt bootloader or Grub2?
I prefer Grub2 for the reason of it's features mentioned before.
This means Grub2 can boot directly from system partition that has /bootmgr.
But how can I boot an encrypted system partition (sda2, Windows10_OS) with VeraCrypt?
Would it make sense to put VeraCrypt bootloader to sda1, SYSTEM_DRV?
THX