From: Jim B. <ji...@ch...> - 2017-06-11 17:59:53
|
Hi John, AGG historically avoided using the C++ standard library, though there is no real reason why that should continue. Don't forget that AGG 2.4 has a permissive licence, incompatible with the GPL. I find such licensing issues quite hard to comprehend, but I suppose this means that significant contributors to AGG 2.4 must consent to their code being included in the GPL'd AGG 2.5? I certainly have no objection to that. Cheers, - Jim On 11 June 2017 at 17:39, John Horigan <jo...@gl...> wrote: > Hi Jerry. I avoided std::numeric_limits<> because I thought that it was a > C++11 feature. But I checked and it isn't. I will create new patches > replacing the macros with std:: namespace constants. > > -- john > |