Matthew Gruenke - 2005-08-03

Logged In: YES
user_id=343027

Oops, I wasn't using the "updated" version of 2.1.

I would just point out that a normal, 3-level version
numbering system would have avoided this confusion. The
typical practice is to have Major.Minor.Patch. Patch gets
incremented when the only changes made are fixes. Minor
gets incremented when backward-compatible, new
functionality is added (and Patch is then reset to 0). Major
gets incremented (and Minor & Patch reset) when
non-backward compatible changes are made.