|
From: Peter C. <p.j...@go...> - 2012-11-26 11:20:34
|
On Mon, Nov 26, 2012 at 5:12 AM, Eric Banks <eb...@br...> wrote: > Hi Bradford, > > I do understand where you're coming from, but truthfully I'd prefer to go in > the opposite direction once we're open to changing delimiters. I've never > quite understood why VCF is tab-delimited and not whitespace-delimited. Tab separated makes it easy to use in Galaxy, R, etc, even Excel - please keep that. It is a good thing! > You wouldn't believe how many times people have manually generated > VCFs that were space-delimited and couldn't understand why they were > failing in VCF parsers. I'd be asking why doesn't your parser give a clearer error message? If you've seen people fall over this pothole many times the parser concerned should be fixed. > I'd much rather that all whitespace be treated equally (as it is > visually). It makes for a much simpler spec. The problem with white space is you can't see how many characters there are - spaces and tabs are not treated equally visually. What would you expect if there were several spaces in a row? If you treat it as one separator you prevent using empty cells (I'm thinking in terms of generalities here, not just VCF). Regards, Peter |