From: Gustavo M. <gmo...@gm...> - 2008-09-01 19:11:45
|
Ok, but PC-104 are usually i486 and is the most commonly used in industrial embedded systems, would be good to support it. GCM On Mon, Sep 1, 2008 at 15:38, Julian Seward <js...@ac...> wrote: > >> The original poster seeks the specific reasons why a 486 isn't good enough. >> Which features of a Pentium-I are essential to valgrind? > > None. 486 isn't supported only because it's yet another cpu variant > which would have to be special-cased in code generation (eg, it doesn't > support cmov) and other aspects (cpuid?), and then verified for each > release. More code and variants always equates with more support > effort in the end, and AFAIR this is the first time in 5+ years that > we've been asked for 486 support. > > And to tell the truth, I never expected anyone to run it on such > a lowly machine. By the time this project started, Pentium-I or > equivalent (AMD K6s) were pretty much everywhere. > > J > > ------------------------------------------------------------------------- > This SF.Net email is sponsored by the Moblin Your Move Developer's challenge > Build the coolest Linux based applications with Moblin SDK & win great prizes > Grand prize is a trip for two to an Open Source event anywhere in the world > http://moblin-contest.org/redirect.php?banner_id=100&url=/ > _______________________________________________ > Valgrind-users mailing list > Val...@li... > https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/valgrind-users > |