From: San M. <net...@va...> - 2001-07-27 17:34:16
|
Ahhh excellent.. however I had found that with more nodes things start to break down with EMP protocol.. simply pinging around on the network a bit could cause problems.. (not good) TGIF -san -----Original Message----- From: Dean Johnson [mailto:dt...@ub...] Sent: Thursday, July 26, 2001 9:41 PM To: San Mehat Cc: 'Ard van Breemen'; vac...@li... Subject: Re: [Vacm-general] Slow EMP handling San Mehat wrote: > Ard, > > This has been a common problem with network T/S's... when receiving data > from the serial port, they wait for either a minimum number of bytes to > arrive, or for a maximum timeout before sending the data over the > network... these devices are normally optimized for streaming protocols > (as they should be), and obviously it doesn't work with us... > That's one of the reasons I like cisco's.. their RAW port *really* is > raw... one byte of data from the serial port ends up sending a frame... > which is why they work.... I also tried other network terminal servers > like the Digi EtherLites, various Livingston beasties, etc... > -san > Bill Sparks (js...@sg...) was able to get the SGI version of the EtherLite working reasonably well with the EMP. It was the latest hardware with the latest firmware, and probably some prevailing tailwind involved, but it worked well. I don't know how it would fare under a load, but it successfully handled bringing an SGI 1200 up and down for many hours without a failure. -Dean |